Search for: "State v. Ore" Results 1401 - 1420 of 2,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2022, 2:56 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 15/6/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard… [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 3:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 08/06/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard… [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 9:02 am by Paul E. Freehling
Ore. 2013), a decision reaching the same result in a civil lawsuit. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 6:05 pm
  The Associated Press reports that "[m]ore than half the teen girls taken from a polygamist compound in west Texas have children or are pregnant," according to State officials. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 10:23 pm
The company had promised a share in the company because he had led them to one of the largest iron ore deposits in the country, the famed Jackson Mine. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 1:59 am by Matrix Law
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:39 pm by Giles Peaker
While R(MA & Ors) v SS DWP had found that “Meantime, local authorities retain their discretion as to the administration of DHPs. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hemmati & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department was heard on 29th and 30th July. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
  Following Mann J’s decision in Gulatti & Ors v MGN Limited [2015] EWHC 1482, endorsed by the Court of Appeal in Representative Claimants -v- Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 1291, (see the Brett Wilson blogs here and here), substantial damages are likely to become more common in privacy claims. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 1:45 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
That case places in question two of the most important decisions on the law of limitation of recent times: Deutsche Morgan Grenfell Group Plc v Inland Revenue Comrs [2006] UKHL 49 (“Deutsche Morgan Grenfell”) and Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Lincoln City Council [1999] 2 AC 349 (“Kleinwort Benson”). [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 11:22 am
" [In re: Linahan, 138 F. 2nd 650 (1943)] (See also: State of West Bengal & Ors. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm by Schachtman
Ore. 1996)(discussing relative risk of 2.0) Pick v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:03 am by INFORRM
In the Courts Australia    Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd & Ors v Wagner & Ors [2020] QCA 221 in the Supreme Court of Queensland considering whether the appellants were sued as joint or several concurrent tortfeasors and accordingly whether the award of damages gives rise to double recovery or satisfaction. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:22 am by Blog Editorial
Ministry of Defence v AB & Ors, heard 14 – 17 November 2011. [read post]