Search for: "Taylor v. State"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 3,056
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2021, 12:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
” by Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) for Yahoo News The post Thursday’s LobbyComply News Roundup appeared first on State and Federal Communications. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:39 am
When the Court first embraced the categoric approach in Taylor v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 3:57 am
Further, a collective bargaining agreement negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law may give persons not otherwise protected by Section 75 certain pre-termination due process rights. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 1:51 am
R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, R (Heathrow Hub Limited & Anor) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, and R (Buckinghamshire County Council & Ors) v The Secretary of State for Transport, heard 15 – 16 October 2013. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:54 am
Agency’s initial decision sustaining an employee’s out-of-title work grievance overturned by the Governor’s Office Of Employee RelationsMatter of Cushing v Governor's Off. of Empl. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
Taylor serves as a board member of Oil States International, Inc. and Tidewater Inc. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:34 am
Very interesting opinion just released—United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
(See Affidavit of Taylor Cratsley, dated November 21, 2016). [read post]
14 May 2007, 1:05 am
Taylor, Lucia A. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:51 am
Bexis participated as amicus curiae in the Michigan case (Taylor v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
In that proceeding Employee had alleged that the Village had breached the collective bargaining agreement by failing to provide him with disability retiree health insurance coverage.* "By commencing an action at law involving arbitrable issues" pursuant to Article 78 the Appellate Division opined that BPTC and Employee "had waived whatever right [they] had to arbitration," citing Hart v Tri-State Consumer, Inc., 18 AD3d 610. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
In that proceeding Employee had alleged that the Village had breached the collective bargaining agreement by failing to provide him with disability retiree health insurance coverage.* "By commencing an action at law involving arbitrable issues" pursuant to Article 78 the Appellate Division opined that BPTC and Employee "had waived whatever right [they] had to arbitration," citing Hart v Tri-State Consumer, Inc., 18 AD3d 610. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 4:02 am
Corporation v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 10:30 am
United States. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
Establishing seniority rights in the course of collective bargainingBregman v East Ramapo Cent. [read post]
19 May 2025, 4:05 am
Taylor, (April 17, 2025).Amy J. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:11 am
No private right of action flows from a mere statement of general policy applicable to all Civil Service employeesMatter of Subway Surface Supervisors Assn. v New York City Tr. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
In contrast, the withdrawal of charges filed against an individual does not toll the statute of limitations insofar as “refilling such charges” at a later date is concerned. * The statute of limitations for State employees designated “managerial or confidential” within the meaning of the Taylor Law is one year except where the charges, if proved in a court of appropriate jurisdiction, constitute a crime, in which case the one-year limitation would not apply. [read post]
