Search for: "Test Plaintiff" Results 1401 - 1420 of 21,972
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2023, 9:15 am by Tiana Guzman
For this reason, the defendant might have to pay for the expenses of regular, ongoing medical testing to monitor people with exposure. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 8:52 am by Arthur F. Coon
  The EIR’s analysis of emissions from 50 hours of annual running time – the maximum permitted by California regulations for testing and maintenance – and adoption of a mitigation measure allowing only 20 hours of such use was a reasonable analysis that left a 30-hour “cushion” for emergency operation. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 2:13 pm by David J. Halberg, Esq.
According to court records from Florida’s 4th District Court of Appeal, the plaintiffs purchased their vehicle in 2004. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
"A state can enforce a generally applicable law that adversely affects religious practices of an individual if the law satisfies the test established in Employment Division v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Chavannes: democratic mandate: plaintiffs said this was 20 years old, and judges were sympathetic: should they really be interpreting the rules this way and preserving safe harbors? [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Dissent: That's not the test; it's sufficient that the officer's conduct shocks the conscience. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:40 am by Jon Hyman
 — via Evil HR Lady, Suzanne Lucas Employees who self-destruct — via Employment & Labor Insider A CBD user drug tests positive. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:36 am by Dennis Crouch
CENDALI from Kirkland & Ellis LLP, New York, NY represented plaintiff-appellant along with ARI LIPSITZ, JOSHUA L. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 4:50 am by Eric B. Meyer
The plaintiff finished a letter from her nurse acknowledging what the plaintiff told her about the CBS use. [read post]
” Because the plaintiffs did not meet the initial hurdle of the standing test, the court did not consider the second and third factors. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 12:31 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” The complaint alleges that the merger should be assessed under the “entire fairness” standard, and that in light of the circumstances, the Merger “cannot meet the exacting entire fairness test. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 8:55 am by Hayley Grunvald
Most of these lack human testing and are able to identify a small percentage of compliance issues. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:42 am by Unknown
Taken together with the demand futility test, this means that the plaintiffs needed to plead that a majority of the director defendants faced a substantial likelihood of liability for breaching their duty of loyalty, acting in bad faith, committing intentional misconduct, or knowingly violating the law. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 2:17 am by Donald Dinnie
The court said however that the reasonable insurer test can only be applied where justified by the text of a particular policy. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 2:36 pm by Eugene Volokh
("It is also undisputed that [plaintiff] made the tapes of the [witness] interview available to the Journal News and that no one at the newspaper took the time to listen to them. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 1:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The fourth-category cases generally were filed later than the cases in the other three categories, so up until now, the sufficiency of the allegations had not yet been tested. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 11:55 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
Subsequently, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Dynamex, which enunciated that a new test – the so-called three-pronged ABC test and not the multi-factor test under Borello – governed the driver’s minimum wage and overtime compensation claims. [read post]