Search for: "U.S. Judiciary"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 11,655
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm
She spent seven years as a federal trial judge before being elevated in 2021 to the U.S. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 11:22 am
He was confirmed to the U.S. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 6:44 am
“Federal judiciary employees should be able to seek justice under the laws meant to protect them”: U.S. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 5:08 pm
The Code governs the behavior of most federal judges; however, it does not explicitly apply to Justices of the U.S. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 9:09 am
U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 9:52 am
” The U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
Nick RobinsonSenior Legal Advisor, U.S. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
He compared milquetoast Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee to an angry mob armed with firearms and strong rope. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 4:15 pm
Bush nominated her for the U.S. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 1:15 pm
The Senate Judiciary Committee is voting on Jackson's confirmation today. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 1:15 pm
While Tillis voted against Judge Jackson’s appointment to the U.S. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:09 am
” “U.S. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 3:04 pm
The U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 10:46 am
-based monthly active users; or (II) had at least 100,000 U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 8:21 am
Law.com has Judges Weigh Tougher Disclosure Requirements for Amicus FilersJudge Paul Watford, of the U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 1:01 am
Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980), was argued on March 17, 1980 and decided on June 16, 1980. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 12:41 pm
The administration’s articulation of its position—set forth in a March 28 U.S. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 11:16 am
And if he had been a member of the local sheriff’s department or a U.S [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 9:03 pm
But the U.S. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:56 am
But other statements in the Kavanaugh concurrence suggest that he reaches this conclusion because he is applying the compelling interest and least restrictive means test in a manner that is deferential to the government, citing precedents that emphasize the limited role of the judiciary in scrutinizing military decisions.Is deference to the military in the application of RFRA appropriate? [read post]