Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court" Results 1401 - 1420 of 29,681
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2009, 4:09 pm
Lee in his place in his decision in Wilson v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:30 am by Mark Walsh
National Collegiate Athletic Association, in which the court later, under the caption Murphy v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 3:45 pm
I know we're still fresh off the Judge (now Justice) Kavanaugh stuff, and nerves of some on this issue may well still be raw.But ponder for a moment what you thought of the allegations in that matter. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 1:18 pm by Amy Howe
The new term is already full of interesting cases, including the very first one on Monday, October 7: Kahler v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Both sets of arguments rely on a formalistic conception of separation of powers.Overrule Chevron, conservative Justices and advocates say, because Article III gives "the judicial power" to courts; judicial power is, as Chief Justice Marshall said for the Court in Marbury v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 2:29 pm by MBettman
Supreme Court heard oral argument in Ohio v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 1:42 pm by Michael Grossman
One of the less discussed cases on the 2016 Supreme Court docket is Musnuff v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 8:27 am by Eugene Volokh
[Well, it's Judge Bradford Thomas of the Florida Court of Appeal, but still an interesting synthesis of recent criticisms, with some extra analysis added.] [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:49 pm by Adam Levitin
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the CFPB's funding mechanism in its 7-2 decision in CFPB v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 6:01 pm by Mark Walsh
” “Even when things were not going well for him at the court, he was genuinely upbeat,” she said. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 1:14 pm
Justice Werdegar rightly responds that with tentatives, you at least have a chance to argue against the tentative to the court that issued it. [read post]
The bench, comprising Chief Justice Chandrachud, Justice Pardiwala and Justice Misra of the Supreme Court in the case of Jane Kaushik v Union of India, issued an order granting permission for service of notice to India’s Central Agency Section, which handles government litigation before the Supreme Court, as well as to the standing counsel for the states of Uttar Pradesh and Gujarat. [read post]