Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 1,882
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2010, 8:33 pm
United States (1997) (and that lurked behind the decision in Medellin v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 2:17 am
In People v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:35 am
Burford v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:52 am
As the Supreme Court made clear in Nixon v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 3:32 am
The (supposed) test The leading case on professional advisors’ potential conflict of interest is Bolkiah v KPMG [1999] 2 AC 222¸where professional advisors (in an analogous position to solicitors) formerly acted for an applicant who then wished to restrain them from acting for its opponent. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:14 am
There’s something particularly remarkable about NLRB v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:56 pm
[2] Herbert Morris Ltd v Saxelby [1916] 1 AC 688. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 12:56 pm
More on Concord v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 1:04 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ACTING THROUGH FARM SERVICE AGENCY, f/k/a FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Appellee. 1st District.Attorney Disqualification: BOFA SEEKS TO OUST AIG LAW FIRM FROM $10 BILLION CASE, AIG v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 10:30 pm
” [see R (Carson) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 37, [2006] 1 AC 173, per Lord Hoffman at p.186H]. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am
If the distinction in cl.4(2) were not drawn in the way that it is, it could in principle entail an enhanced personal right to access information including governmental information (see in this context the discussion in Kennedy v Information Commissioner [2015] AC 455 (SC)). [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 8:42 pm
Dubin v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 7:07 am
He cites the Brown v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 7:10 pm
Du Cros Ltd. (1913) AC 624 at 634, 635) Lord Parker of Waddington having remarked upon the difficulty of finding the right criterion by which to determine whether a proposed mark is or is not "adapted to distinguish" the applicant's goods defined the crucial question practically as I have stated it, and added two sentences which have often been quoted but to which it is well to return for an understanding of the problem in a case such as the present. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 2:50 pm
In the matter of Walter v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:19 am
” At ElectionLaw@Moritz, Edward Foley discusses Gill v. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 10:32 pm
What puzzles me slightly, particularly given the stated aim of consistency, is the difference in approach to that of Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties Ltd [2008] 1 WLR 289 (which I briefly discussed here). [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:30 pm
Co-operators General Insurance Co., 2002 SCC 30, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 129, and ACS Public Sector Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 1:14 am
Back in 2000 in the House of Lords case White v White, Lord Thorpe stated that the calculation is ‘a tool not a rule’. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 10:09 am
Pace v. [read post]
