Search for: "COOPER v. STATE"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 7,407
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2023, 6:02 am
In State v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 1:11 am
Thus, the ECtHR seems to place greater importance on cooperation in criminal matters than on cooperation in civil matters. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 9:00 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:18 am
State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:57 am
The previous comparable case was in 2009, when WIPO cooperated with the Florida authorities in a successful legal action against a Florida-based company which was sending out by mass mail misleading “invoices” to patent and trade mark applicants—including users of WIPO’s Patent Cooperation Treaty. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 3:13 pm
In state postconviction proceedings, the petitioner refused to cooperate with an expert hired by his counsel. [read post]
20 May 2007, 8:40 am
" Cooper v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 5:55 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 7:43 am
The SEC handles disgorgement and the DOJ imposes penalties and they do not double count, he stated. [read post]
12 May 2010, 3:37 am
In State v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 3:00 am
Attorney’s Office in Brooklyn filed its forfeiture complaint on February 27, a case captioned as U.S. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:17 am
The New Jersey Supreme Court’s 2008 ruling in State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 10:16 am
This article, which is based upon a review of all of the surviving docket books from that Term, considers what those sources can teach us about the cases comprising what some have called the “switch-in-time”: West Coast Hotel Co v Parrish, which upheld Washington State’s minimum wage law for women and overruled Adkins v Children’s Hospital; the Labor Board Cases, which upheld the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Act; and the Social… [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 10:16 am
This article, which is based upon a review of all of the surviving docket books from that Term, considers what those sources can teach us about the cases comprising what some have called the “switch-in-time”: West Coast Hotel Co v Parrish, which upheld Washington State’s minimum wage law for women and overruled Adkins v Children’s Hospital; the Labor Board Cases, which upheld the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Act; and the Social… [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 8:23 am
As a consequence scholars knew very little about the Court’s internal deliberations in the landmark cases of its 1936 October Term.This article, which is based upon a review of all of the surviving docket books from that Term, considers what those sources can teach us about the cases comprising what some have called the “switch-in-time”: West Coast Hotel Co v Parrish, which upheld Washington State’s minimum wage law for women and overruled Adkins v… [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:26 am
States are barred by a Supreme Court precedent, Massachusetts v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 5:30 pm
In the first, Lin v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 9:15 am
Johnson and United States v. [read post]
Argument analysis: Justices express skepticism over using legislative motive in pre-emption analysis
6 Nov 2018, 8:22 am
In responding to these justices’ worries over developing a workable motive-infused standard, Cooper proposed that the Supreme Court apply the test from the civil rights decision Village of Arlington Heights v. [read post]
