Search for: "Chambers v. State" Results 1421 - 1440 of 4,823
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2009, 11:49 am
However, based on the conclusion (or assumption) that Section 399(3) does not speak of consent in writing, the Court stated that the reasoning of the decision in Makhan Lal Jain v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:24 am by Tejinder Singh
Today in the Community we are discussing United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 12:13 am
Three more amicus briefs supporting the petition for writ of certiorari in Empress Casino Joliet Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 5:25 pm
The footnote in question (footnote 1) can be seen here: As this case comes to the Court, we assume (without deciding) that the state appellate court's decision affirming the exclusion of Maples' testimony was an unreasonable application of Chambers v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 9:09 am by Cyberleagle
The ECtHR gave a Chamber judgment on 13 September 2018. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:06 am by INFORRM
Judgment was handed down today by Mr Justice Bean in the libel case of Cooke and Anor v MGN ([2014] EWHC 2831 (QB)). [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 11:00 am
Michigan Chamber of Commerce in 1990 and part of McConnell v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 3:47 am by INFORRM
The substantial truth of this allegation was not affected by the BBC having inaccurately stated that the claimant made such a statement at East London Mosque. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by INFORRM
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:22 pm by Gene Quinn
In March of 2006, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 1:25 pm by David Lat
– Chief Justice John Roberts, benchslapping the dissents by Justices Breyer and Sotomayor in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 11:47 am by Holly Johnston, Esq.
New York is now one of 16 states—and the first with a Republican-controlled chamber—supporting an amendment in response to the decision. [read post]