Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 12,891
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2008, 5:15 am
CEO Compensation : The CEO, C. [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:00 am
MIP filed a notice of opposition ex Article 42 of Regulation 40/94 (Article 41 CTMR), relying on Article 8(1)(b) of the same Regulation. macros consult GmbH, on the other hand, submitted an application for a declaration of invalidity of MIP's figurative sign, under Articles 52(1)(c) and 55 of Regulation 40/94 (Articles 53(1)(c) and 56 CTMR). [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:49 pm
Motorola, Inc. et al., ND Ill, June 29, 2010, No. 07 C 4507).Section 105(b)(5(A) is a clear and unambiguous provision that protects from disclosure only materials that an accounting firm prepared specifically for the Board. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 4:52 am
§ 1030(c)(2)(B). [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
ESG Risks for Cannabis Companies Will Impact Directors and Officers Consider the potential ESG risks that could impact the C-suite of a cannabis business. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 5:47 pm
A few ideas: (a) Gather and summarize your evaluation of each primary provider, including specifics about what they've done well and where they've slipped, invite in their lead partners for a little get-together and have them later reply formally as to how they are going to rectify the situation in the future; (b) If their response to your issues are not met with changed performance in a reasonable amount of time, start marginalizing their role by spinning off work to other law… [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:19 pm
Private funds almost always rely on one of two exemptions, Rule 506(b) or Rule 506(c), both of which are part of Regulation D, promulgated under the Securities Act. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 10:03 am
Moreover, issuers including start-up companies gravitate to Rule 506(b) over the other exemptions because it’s the easiest to put in place: it can be used anytime and without the disclosures the other private offering exemptions or public registrations mandate. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 4:46 am
Yet within hours of taking effect, anti-piracy companies began sending notices that included settlement demands backed by threats of litigation. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 9:00 am
Carelessly and negligently allowed its insurance company to hire a hack claims adjustor; c. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:22 am
The current list is short – just four nations, including China: (A) the Democratic People’s Republic of North Korea; (B) the People’s Republic of China (C)the Russian Federation; and (D)the Islamic Republic of Iran. 10 U.S.C. 4872(d)(2). [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 12:33 pm
CC&C Management Services, LLC, B-417594 (Comp. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 6:24 am
J-B Weld Company, LLC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:06 am
This case, C-632/22 – AB Volvo ./. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
At SAC, Rules Compliance With an ‘Edge’ by James B. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 10:10 pm
Opposer Learning Annex was schooled by the TTAB in its opposition to registration of the mark SECRETS OF THE MILLIONAIRE MIND for tapes and CDs, various printed materials, and educational services relating to self-improvement and wealth accumulation: (A) Opposer neglected to prove its standing; (B) Opposer failed to establish that the subject mark is merely descriptive under Section 2(e)(1); and (C) Opposer wrongly asserted that the mark is unregistrable as the title of a single… [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 11:10 am
Havelock, No. 08-10472 (8-23-10) (Canby with B. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:54 am
” While clearly not as extensive and as fulsome a remedy as reinstatement under section 79(2)(b) of the Act, the remedy under section 79(2)(c) seeks, as far as is economically possible, to return the employee to the position he or she would have been in had the employer’s misconduct not occurred. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:54 am
” While clearly not as extensive and as fulsome a remedy as reinstatement under section 79(2)(b) of the Act, the remedy under section 79(2)(c) seeks, as far as is economically possible, to return the employee to the position he or she would have been in had the employer’s misconduct not occurred. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 10:48 am
., No. 07 C 6535, 2008 WL 2095605 (N.D. [read post]
