Search for: "Company Doe v. Public Citizen"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 2,031
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2022, 5:00 am
Brown v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
WellPoint, Inc.o Federal Law Does Not Permit Racial Discrimination Based Upon Client's PreferencesPleener v. [read post]
11 Feb 2023, 5:14 am
PanamaSilva v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:47 am
Maryland – Hershey v. [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 10:49 am
Marc's memo to staff, which expresses concern for possible lack of empathy in the early days of the pandemic, (1) does not say Marc should have quarantined or that he violated any medical or public health direction to quarantine; or (2) that Marc should have alerted staff that he was taking a test for coronavirus. [103.] [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
William Blackstone wrote that this liberty “consists in laying no previous restraints upon publications” though it does not forbid subsequent punishment for criminal matter. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 9:41 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:01 am
But the tone of the language used in the opinions in the Citizens United case suggest that the Court’s proceedings have taken on a deeply personal character, with emotional overtones that have become all too public. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:56 am
In turning aside the claim that the House committee was exceeding its powers by focusing its probe in part on Trump’s activities as a private citizen, the judge sought to diminish the significance of an 1880 Supreme Court decision, in the case of Kilbourn v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
But we part company at this point. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm
When this is weakened, both commercial marketing and public safety efforts are weakened as well. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:28 am
Campbell-Ewald Company v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
"[2] Regulatory preferences differ across states because states differ in their citizens' tastes, moral views, wealth, willingness to pay, and the like. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 12:07 pm
Legislative activities inevitably affect individual citizens; for some the affect is positive, and for others the affect is negative, but the legislative activity has a public character and to quote Justice Laskin “the risk of loss from the exercise of legislative or adjudicative authority is a general public risk and not one for which compensation can be supported on the basis of a private duty of care”. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
The VA interpreted the purposes language to mean that it does not have to comply with the requirement unless limiting competition is necessary to meet the goals. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 12:53 am
In the courts: The Independent Schools Council v The Charity Commission [2011] UKUT 421 (TCC) (13 October 2011)October 15, 2011 Upper Tribunal rules Independent (private) schools (1) have purposes in the public benefit for the purposes of charity law, (2) must help the poor but (3) How it does (2) is fact sensitive and a judgment for the trustees so Charity Commission guidance too prescriptive. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
Because Puerto Rico’s public utilities are categorically excluded from restructuring debt under Chapter 9 of the federal Bankruptcy Code (although the fifty states’ public utilities are not), the Commonwealth enacted the Recovery Act, which, among other things, “creates a mechanism for Puerto Rico’s public corporations to restructure their debt so that they can continue to provide essential public services … while at the same time… [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 11:00 am
Saudi-Aramco, the world’s most valuable company, would soon offer shares to the public, but not on American stock exchanges. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 1:44 pm
And it means making sure the government does more of its work online, just like companies are doing. [read post]
