Search for: "Cooper v. State"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 7,441
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2011, 9:57 am
The previous comparable case was in 2009, when WIPO cooperated with the Florida authorities in a successful legal action against a Florida-based company which was sending out by mass mail misleading “invoices” to patent and trade mark applicants—including users of WIPO’s Patent Cooperation Treaty. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 6:02 am
In State v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 11:41 am
Cayuga Nation (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act; Fee Lands; Reservation Disestablishment) Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
" The court also rejected Plaintiff's argument that DOE's "Position Statement" was unsigned and undated hearsay, noting "Generally, administrative proceedings need not conform to all of the ... evidentiary rules adhered to in judicial tribunals", citing Matter of Church of Scientology of N.Y. v Tax Commn. of City of N.Y., 120 AD2 376, nor need an agency "state with specificity its detailed analysis," or "point to any… [read post]
20 Feb 2025, 1:21 pm
Volterra & Florentine Vos, How (not) to Compensate for State Responsibility in Armed Conflict - the DRC v Uganda Reparations Judgment and the International Law of Reparations Marcela Zúñiga Reyes, Interstate Cooperation Regarding Reparations for Victims: Analysis of the Julien Grisonas v Argentina Case in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights Global Policies and Law Peter Hough, What's Your Poison? [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
" The court also rejected Plaintiff's argument that DOE's "Position Statement" was unsigned and undated hearsay, noting "Generally, administrative proceedings need not conform to all of the ... evidentiary rules adhered to in judicial tribunals", citing Matter of Church of Scientology of N.Y. v Tax Commn. of City of N.Y., 120 AD2 376, nor need an agency "state with specificity its detailed analysis," or "point to any… [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 1:11 am
Thus, the ECtHR seems to place greater importance on cooperation in criminal matters than on cooperation in civil matters. [read post]
12 May 2010, 3:37 am
In State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:26 am
States are barred by a Supreme Court precedent, Massachusetts v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 5:30 pm
In the first, Lin v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 1:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 9:00 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
” As Chief Justice Marshall put it (quoting Justice Ginsburg in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:18 am
State v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 5:55 am
United States v. [read post]
20 May 2007, 8:40 am
" Cooper v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:30 am
United States and Dorsey v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:17 am
The New Jersey Supreme Court’s 2008 ruling in State v. [read post]
Argument analysis: Justices express skepticism over using legislative motive in pre-emption analysis
6 Nov 2018, 8:22 am
In responding to these justices’ worries over developing a workable motive-infused standard, Cooper proposed that the Supreme Court apply the test from the civil rights decision Village of Arlington Heights v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 3:00 am
Attorney’s Office in Brooklyn filed its forfeiture complaint on February 27, a case captioned as U.S. v. [read post]
