Search for: "GROUP v. JONES."
Results 1421 - 1440
of 1,651
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Recently, the Ontario Court of Appeal linked that jurisprudence to an examination of informational privacy in Jones v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
Jones, No. 1:11-cv-0718, 2013 WL 1164929, at *6 (E.D. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 12:08 pm
Invalidity Bones and the Cancellation of the Crystal SkullSkullduggery Rum Ltd v Globefill Incorporated [2020] ETMR 9 EUIPO Cancellation Division (October 2019)Ignore my misleading title – this is nothing to do with Indiana Jones and, in a rare positive decision for a non-traditional mark, did not lead to the cancellation of Globefill’s EUTM for the 3D shape illustrated below. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
[6] Id. at 378-79 (arguing that the Constitution's original meaning (1) cannot be determined because a group has no single intent, and the Framers and Ratifiers who expressed their understanding often disagreed; and (2) has no special relevance in resolving modern problems) [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Studies using polygraph examinations to elicit disclosures have found that sex offenders have often committed sex crimes that went undisclosed and were never reported to police or child protection agencies (Ahlmeyer, Heil, McKee, & English, 2000; English, Jones, Pasini-Hill, Patrick, & Cooley-Towell, 2000; Heil, Ahlmeyer, & Simons, 2003). [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
If Baxter’s expert invoked the IARC working group’s classification for complete exoneration of DEHP, then Greenland’s point is fair enough. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:38 pm
If Baxter’s expert invoked the IARC working group’s classification for complete exoneration of DEHP, then Greenland’s point is fair enough. [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:41 am
Jones [2006] UKHL 16. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
" Consider, for instance, United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:04 am
So too, there is the very real potential for trivial claims to be struck under Dow Jones & Co Inc v Jameel [2005] EWCA Civ 75, [2005] QB 946 for abuse of process. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 12:05 pm
Discrimination Jones, Lauren E. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 1:21 am
The case before the seven-judge panel asked whether Henry V should be held criminally responsible for the mass execution of French prisoners of war after the Battle of Agincourt in 1415. [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 4:34 pm
Despite some judicial remarks in earlier decisions suggesting that serious harm might, in appropriate circumstances, be decided by way of preliminary issue (see, for example, Warby J, as he then was, in Hamilton v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2020] EWHC 59 (QB)), it is now generally accepted that serious harm is best decided at trial, a position endorsed by paragraph 17.34 of the King’s Bench Guide 2024. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
The Relevance and Admissibility of Rezoning and Comparable Sales Occurring After the Date of Taking, When Determining the Value of Condemned Property by Alan T. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 7:37 am
The Attention Deficit Disorder Clinic Phone: (505) 820-1339 Attention Deficit Disorders Association - Southern Region (ADDA) 12345 Jones Road, Suite 287 Houston, TX 77070 Phone: (281) 897-0982 Web: http://www.adda-sr.org Autism Southwest Autism Network Web: http://cdd.unm.edu/swan New Mexico Autism Society P.O. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:52 am
State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:52 pm
American Idol Lawsuit Claims Sony Stiffs Carrie Underwood, Kelly Clarkson 19 Recordings Limited v. [read post]
