Search for: "Hoffman v. Hoffman" Results 1421 - 1440 of 1,525
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
Sajar Plastics[7th Cir.]o 7th Defines Who Is A Supervisor Under Title VIIAndonissany v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP)   Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP)   Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark)   Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46)   Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in… [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 10:09 pm
As many readers may know, Ehrlich's work in the 1970s was cited in Gregg v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm by Jeff Hermes
We have some important news to share from the Digital Media Law Project. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 12:00 am by Jeff Hermes
We have some important news to share from the Digital Media Law Project. [read post]
2 May 2010, 4:25 am by sevach
 Si subsisten las dudas, hay que optar por la que en primera lectura, y de forma intuitiva,  se daba por válida. 6. [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 9:07 pm by The Regulatory Review
Morrison, George Washington University Law School In Corner Post v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 9:02 am
The all-time points leader in this hard-contested competition – which Merpel has just now invented – is Lord Hoffman for that unbeatable one-two combination in Improver v Remington which has had trainee patent attorneys reaching for their dictionaries for over two decades: “the patentee was intending the word or phrase to have not a literal but a figurative meaning (the figure being a form of synecdoche or metonymy)”.] [read post]