Search for: "Hooks v. State"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 1,553
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2011, 6:13 pm
(Follow the links for Part I, Part II, Part III and Part IV.) [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 8:39 am
" 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 10:10 am
Qualitatively, the portions reproduced are the opening “hook” of the article, and the summary of the facts on which the article was based. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:05 am
Habib, who is Australian, had been one of the four petitioners in Rasul v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:05 am
In StarNet Insurance Co. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:36 am
Dawes off the hook (kinda) – the reformers in power in DC stripped Indians of their property rights without tribal consent (the cases of Lone Wolf v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:03 am
He says that as this is asserted as state practice, many will see it as freeing the United States to do what it wants; but he thinks this will lead other states to believe that they’re accountable for their uses of covert force, as the United States says it is. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
The people who have enjoyed the free ride provided by the realization requirement are, however, unsurprisingly annoyed by the possibility that they might have to pay taxes like the little people do, so they are starting to complain.Even so, an excellent explainer in Tuesday’s New York Times ends with this: The problem may be in the Constitution, which gives Congress broad powers to impose taxes, but says “direct taxes”—a term without clear definition—should be… [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
The people who have enjoyed the free ride provided by the realization requirement are, however, unsurprisingly annoyed by the possibility that they might have to pay taxes like the little people do, so they are starting to complain.Even so, an excellent explainer in Tuesday’s New York Times ends with this: The problem may be in the Constitution, which gives Congress broad powers to impose taxes, but says “direct taxes”—a term without clear definition—should be… [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:37 pm
" Romano v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 8:24 pm
What was interesting about this case (Polovnikoff v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
The third case, EEOC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 6:55 am
” On her first day in office, Attorney General Pam Bondi issued this memorandum stating that “State and local actors may not impede, obstruct, or otherwise fail to comply with lawful immigration-related directives pursuant to the President's Article II authority to ensure national security, the Immigration and Nationality Act, or other authorities. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 6:53 am
District Judge Linda V. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 4:05 am
Justice Chan Keeps Quontic on the Hook. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:55 am
You agree this choice of law provision replaces, supersedes and preempts any provision of law of any state or nation to the contrary. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 8:44 am
In Garcia v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s landmark 2018 decision Ohio v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:07 pm
Those creditors would not have the same interests as the state (and would include creditors in other classes), but the state would be bound by their vote and would have to share the [read post]
