Search for: "Kelly v. State" Results 1421 - 1440 of 2,063
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm by Giles Peaker
No prejudice to the leaseholders had been found by the FTT, pursuant to Daejan Investments Ltd v Benson (2013) UKSC 14. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:06 am by New Books Script
51 new acquisitions for the Osgoode Hall Law School Library, including 28 from 2012: HJ 5316 E58 2011 Environmental taxation and climate change : achieving environmental sustainability through fiscal policy edited by Larry Kreiser, Julsuchada Sirisom, Hope Ashiabor, Janet E. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 By Eric SegallThis was a no good, terrible, very bad year at the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 9:02 pm
American Home Products Corp., 29 F.3d 165, 169 (4th Cir. 1994); Kelly v. [read post]
10 Mar 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
” Therefore, the resignation could not be withdrawn without the board’s consent.In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly 8 the decision reports that the then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
10 Mar 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
” Therefore, the resignation could not be withdrawn without the board’s consent.In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly 8 the decision reports that the then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
Evan Lee previews United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:20 am by James Romoser
” In an essay for The Regulatory Review’s annual Supreme Court series, Alejandro Camacho and Melissa Kelly discuss the County of Maui v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 4:20 am
"As an example, a trustee of the State University pleaded guilty of attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree, a Class A misdemeanor. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 5:23 pm
Many of those subjected to such detention fees (and associated enforcement action) had hoped that the decision of the NSW Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal ("CTTT") in DV Kelly Pty Ltd v China Shipping (Australia) Agency Co Pty Ltd would serve as the basis to cause shipping lines and their agents to review (and reduce) fees and associated enforcement action. [read post]