Search for: "Legal Writing Prof"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 1,960
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2010, 7:24 am
Scalia responded with a scathing comment: "Prof. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:27 am
So it is with Prof. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:49 am
[LATER: Prof. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
Legal research, blogging and AI Writes David Allen Green, “Could Artificial Intelligence replicate, or even replace, the work of your normal contracts lawyer? [read post]
6 May 2011, 6:50 am
Prof. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am
Still, this is less than 10% of Prof. de Beer’s number of 852. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 7:47 pm
Another way students can get involved through CSHR is with the Legal Research and Advocacy Committee (LRAC), where student volunteers will have the opportunity to complete pro-bono human rights related research and writing projects for local and international NGOs. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 9:30 am
Prof. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 2:48 pm
At various times, it’s been adopted by a large number of law school’s legal writing programs. [read post]
21 May 2017, 10:41 am
Gregory Sisk For the symposium on James Pfander, Constitutional Torts and the War on Terror.In his new book “Constitutional Torts and the War on Terror,” Prof. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie writes that “the majority opinion in Flowers, penned by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, stretched to 31 pages but, as it said, broke ‘no new legal ground. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 5:52 am
See also In re Supreme Court Advisory Comm. on Prof’l Ethics No. 697, 188 N.J. 549, 558 (2006). [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 3:36 am
So Carrie Goldberg would call on her twitter followers to attack a law prof, as her client was attacked by some sick guy he picked on Grindr, for disagreeing with her legal position? [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 8:05 am
Don’t solos need strong analytical, issue-spotting and writing skills? [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 6:00 am
Prof. 201 (2016-2017)(Halaby Article); Note, Discriminatory Lawyers in a Discriminatory Bar, 40 Harvard J. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 7:07 am
VelvelSubject: RE: Prof. [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:26 am
The PP did not at any particular stage of the oral proceedings indicate an intention to hear Steven Trybus and the OD therefore did not need to decide on this question.11.2.4 Separate Appealable Decision on Legal Entitlement to Priority：43 The PP argued during oral proceedings and in writing that a separate appealable decision should be issued by the OD with respect to legal… [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 8:14 am
2) Liberal law profs (and some conservatives) often complain about the Court's re-writing of the 11th Amendment which provides the following:The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.This is the rare litigated constitutional provision that is completely clear. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 7:35 am
This was not legal analysis; Solzhenitsyn had bigger tasks at hand. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 12:30 pm
Click here to read an IJ amicus brief, written on behalf of Vanderbilt prof James W. [read post]
