Search for: "MATTER OF C M R"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 2,967
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2015, 4:21 pm
§ 51.28(a)(3)(ii)(E), (c)(3); see, e.g., Patrawke v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 12:05 pm
(Mind you, I’m not saying that this happened.) 2. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 4:30 pm
C. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:56 am
Doctors referred the case to Connecticut’s Department of Children and Families (DCF), which took the matter to the Connecticut Superior Court. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 4:31 pm
C. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 7:00 am
Taylor, Benjamin C. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 11:34 pm
Alan M. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
The first episode addresses biotech inventions in general, controversies, case law, hot topics, and biotech R&D financing, also providing some interesting figures of the matter. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 4:46 pm
Please schedule an appointment if you need experienced legal representation in a traffic/municipal court matter. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 12:20 pm
Deirdre M. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am
Increasingly, the courts have been challenged to resolve complex disputes arising from new uses of works and other subject matter brought about by innovations in technology. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 8:32 am
Louis R. [read post]
25 Dec 2014, 11:27 am
But he likely doesn’t meet the criteria to be tax exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 1:08 am
I’m not saying I was the first one to say it, which would be preposterous. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 12:48 pm
To skip most of the judgment, this concerned a child, P, and his parents, F & M. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 8:58 am
To give one example, from Phillip M. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:44 pm
In order to provide the benefit of the exemption to advisers who manage funds exempt under 3(c)(5) as well as funds exempt under 3(c)(1) and 3(c)(7), the Rule states that an adviser can treat funds exempt under 3(c)(5) the same as funds exempt under 3(c)(1) and 3(c)(7), and still be exempt. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
.* The chorus swells - another entreaty to the AC about BattistelliMerpel recounts of another letter upon the hot issue of the suspension of a Board of Appeal, this time from Dr Tilman Müller-Stoy. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:14 am
As readers of this blog know, I’m all for privatizing inheritance litigation whenever possible. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 10:29 pm
"An anticipating reference must be enabling; that is, thedescription must be such that a person of ordinary skill in the field of theinvention can practice the subject matter based on the reference, without undueexperimentation. [read post]
