Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 1421 - 1440 of 16,583
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2023, 7:40 am by Ronald Mann
Elster, of course, presents quite a different view of the matter. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 12:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The matter shown in broken lines is not part of the mark and serves only to show the position or placement of the mark. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 1:59 am
 Case C 147/14 Loutfi Management Propriété intellectuelle SARL v AMJ Meatproducts NV, Halalsupply NV is a Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruling last Thursday in a Community trade mark-related reference from Belgium. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:56 am
” The Government of the United Kingdom identified the emblem as “[t]he official emblem of the Prince of Wales” when it notified WIPO in 2005, under the Paris Convention, that this emblem is a ‘state emblem’ of the United Kingdom. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 10:04 am by Jonathan Bailey
However, Mark wasn’t one to let the matter drop. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  KIND argued that the Bristol-Myers rule didn’t apply because the Clif marks weren’t prominent enough and weren’t universally recognized, and because the KIND trade dress was remembered better than the name. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 11:49 pm by Legal Momma is now The Real UnHousewife
No matter whether your married, boo'ed up, or supa-fly and single...Happy Valentine's / Single's Awareness Day!!! [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 12:32 pm
In that vein, she believes that a president usually deserves the benefit of the doubt from Congress on matters of executive authority.... . . . [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:45 am
IPKat clarifies matters: The new AG Opinion in Louboutin: is it really bad news for the famous red sole? [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 1:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  His proposed trial testimony was no better: he said, inter alia, that a hiatus from a band is not enough to relinquish ownership in the band; and that “[t]here are multiple ways in which an owner of a mark can continue to participate and exploit that mark even though they may not be standing up on stage and performing. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 12:24 pm
See id. at 4 n.1.Id. at 9 n.1.While Chief Judge Effron's point is important as a predictive matter, it doesn't turn those three judges' views into precedent. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:42 am by Jon Hyman
No matter how good intentioned an employer might be, if you take race or gender into account in hiring or retaining employees, you've violated Title VII. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 3:31 am
Katfriend Gill Grassie (Brodies LLP) discusses the matter of Tartan Army Ltd v Sett GmbH and Others [2017] CSOH 22. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
It’s not simply a matter of anonymous people being up to no good: platform design and moderation has a lot to do with what kinds of behaviours are allowed, and thrive, on social media. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Rogers simply requires that the junior user didn’t arbitrarily choose to use the mark just to exploit its publicity value. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 12:10 pm
No matter of Villager Wonk BS is going to change that. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 2:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  (See Jessica Silbey’s work.)Strandburg: might be that counterfeiting doesn’t matter as long as it’s illegal. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 11:11 pm
  Mark writes: Prosecutors seem so proud of themselves when they argue, "Don't show me photos of the defendant's kids. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 1:50 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
However, as the CJEU explained for trade mark matters, it is insufficient for the sign concerned to be regarded as being “in bad taste”.The same approach was adopted by the German Federal Patent Court in 10 W (pat) 713/02. [read post]