Search for: "Matter of S.W."
Results 1421 - 1440
of 1,494
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
Turks and Caicos International Extradition Treaty with the United States June 8, 1972, Date-Signed January 21, 1977, Date-In-Force (The treaty applicable to Turks and Caicos was signed with the United Kingdom.) [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
Falkland Islands International Extradition Treaty with the United States June 8, 1972, Date-Signed January 21, 1977, Date-In-Force (The treaty applicable to the Falkland Islands was signed with the United Kingdom.) [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:00 am
Kiribati International Extradition Treaty with the United States June 8, 1972, Date-Signed January 21, 1977, Date-In-Force (The treaty applicable to Kiribati was signed with the United Kingdom.) [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
Cayman Islands International Extradition Treaty with the United States June 8, 1972, Date-Signed January 21, 1977, Date-In-Force (The treaty applicable to the Cayman Islands was signed with the United Kingdom.) [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
Bermuda International Extradition Treaty with the United States June 8, 1972, Date-Signed January 21, 1977, Date-In-Force (The treaty applicable to the Bermuda was signed with the United Kingdom.) [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:00 am
Montserrat International Extradition Treaty with the United States June 8, 1972, Date-Signed January 21, 1977, Date-In-Force (The treaty applicable to Montserrat was signed with the United Kingdom.) [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
Gibraltar International Extradition Treaty with the United States (The treaty applicable to the Gibraltar was signed with the United Kingdom.) [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
CONFOUNDING Back in 2000, several law professors wrote an essay, in which they detailed some of the problems faced in expert witness gatekeeping. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
It doesn't matter what the product is (it doesn't even have to be a product). [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
(Commercial advertising is less protected than other speech, especially when it is false or misleading, but this stems from other features of commercial advertising, not from the fact that it's justified by listener interests.[3]) Nonetheless, even if an AI program's output is like a newspaper's output, the AI company would still be potentially exposed to libel liability: The company could be liable if it knows certain statements the program is communicating are false and defamatory… [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 4:43 am
Love, 92 S.W.3d 450, 452 (Tex. 2002) (Similar case regarding a dancer becoming intoxicated per the employer business plan. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:31 pm
S.N., 973 S.W.2d 301, 306 (Tex. 1998); Elder v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm
Hamilton, 310 S.W.3d 476 (Tex. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
There are others relating to violation claims that bear discussion.On page 40 of the SSF slip opinion, the court addressed a claim that, supposedly, the defendant violated some FDA regulation that required it to submit a supplemental PMA application for each and every modification to the device, no matter how trivial. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
Chambers, 883 S.W.2d 650 (Tex.1994) (when analyzing a police officer’s liability in a high-speed pursuit, an important factor to be considered is the danger that the threat of such liability would deter an officer’s willingness to execute his office with the decisiveness and the judgment required by the public good.) [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 9:18 am
Digging one step deeper, these bills, at their core, are saying that the content of a restricted access social media account is private no matter how many people the user invites to view that content and regardless of the relationship between the user and the viewer. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:22 pm
What matters is what courts say. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
[I blogged an early draft of this essay three months ago, but I've revised it extensively since then. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am
Applying this standard, the district court held that EA was not protected by the First Amendment as a matter of law, and the Ninth Circuit affirmed. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 5:07 am
The plaintiff argues that the term "amount of loss," as that term is used in the appraisal provision, entails more than just the amount of damages, but also includes a determination of the scope of loss; in other words, what caused the loss.The defendant responds with four arguments:One, that the plaintiff has not met the appropriate requirements for a "summary judgment" motion; Two, that the dispute is inherently one regarding whether there was a… [read post]
