Search for: "Owings v. Respondent"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 2,317
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2013, 7:44 am
In the case, Mata v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:00 am
He owes a duty to each. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 3:21 pm
In point of fact, in Higgs v Foster [2004] EWCA Civ 843, where a police officer in pursuit of a suspected criminal fell into an uncovered inspection pit at night, it was held that the landowner owed no duty of care to trespassers in the circumstances. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:57 am
In Budinich v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 8:09 am
However, the surcharge was not treated as a tip or gratuity owed to delivery drivers. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 2:44 am
If Oracle v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 10:28 am
New York responded to news of the speculators’ efforts by redoubling its own efforts. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 9:49 am
But that didn’t mean that the taxpayer owed the tax bill. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 10:43 pm
In the case, Kindig v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
My article, "Transnational Corporations' Outward Expression of Inward Self-Constitution: The Enforcement of Human Rights by Apple, Inc." has just been published and will appear in the Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20(2):805-879 (2013). [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:37 pm
Unfortunately, owing once more to extensive redactions, it is awfully hard to tell what that information is. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 6:00 am
In doing so, they cite a 1959 case from the Southern District of New York, Manning v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:26 am
The Supreme Court will determine whether the respondents owed a duty of care in negligence to the individual investing in the moor and, if they did, whether they also owed it to the appellant limited liability partnership. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 9:49 am
” Id. at *8, quoting Zuill v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:41 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), and PLIVA v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:03 am
The IUB responded that if the agency were just resolving the amounts owed rather than whether amounts were owed in the first place, that would be a “garden-variety” private dispute with less state interest. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:07 am
The case is Gjuraj v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 4:58 am
In Liberty Mutual v. [read post]
