Search for: "PROFESSORS OF SECOND AMENDMENT LAW" Results 1421 - 1440 of 4,985
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Second, I say they are subjected to a “version” of strict scrutiny, because the original RFRA drafters weren’t satisfied with ordinary strict scrutiny from the free exercise cases. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 8:50 am by Randy E. Barnett
BOOT CAMP LECTURE TOPICS • Overview of Originalism (Georgetown Law Professor Lawrence Solum) • Normative Rationales For Originalism (Georgetown Law Professor Randy Barnett) • Criticisms of Originalism (George Washington Law Professor Thomas Colby) • Public Meaning Originalism (Professor Solum) • Original Methods Originalism (USD Professor Michael Rappaport) • Framework Originalism (Yale Law… [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
They again have left prison conditions to legislatures and administrative agencies.UCLA Law Professor Sharon Dolovich has documented the doctrinal consequences of such a view. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 8:27 am by Carol Steiker and Jordan Steiker
Friendly Professor of Law and Faculty Co-Director of the Criminal Justice Policy Program at Harvard Law School. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
The law also provides (presumably to give an appointed justice time to campaign) that if the vacancy is filled shortly before (and certainly after) a primary election but before the general election in an election year, then the appointed justice serves until the second upcoming general election. [read post]
Here, Stanford Law School Professor David Sklansky discusses key takeaways of the hearings and possible next steps. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
That view is greater among self-identified political conservatives (67%) than among liberals (46%).Sadly, the best known provision of the Bill of Rights turns out to be the Second Amendment. 83% of Americans know what that Amendment says and, more surprising, that the Supreme Court has recognized a constitutional right for individuals to own a handgun.This is a kind of good news/bad news picture. [read post]
So, for example, when a public-figure plaintiff sues a magazine under the state tort law of defamation, the defendant can properly invoke the First Amendment as a defense, even though the plaintiff is a private individual rather than the government, because the plaintiff is relying on state-adopted tort law for his claim. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
In fact, the only right in the entire Constitution that is absolute is the right to believe whatever you choose under the First Amendment. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Mark Graber on the second impeachment (WBALTV). [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 10:15 pm by J.W. Verret
 A few of my defenses would, however, require amendment to the DGCL. [read post]
26 May 2015, 4:00 am by Adam Dodek
A law professor who can write good fiction? [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
My work with Professor Dorf led to the conclusion that there actually is a right answer to the question: Which law should the president set aside, in order to obey the other two? [read post]
31 May 2011, 2:41 pm by Gabe Johnson-Karp
This post is a summary of a full-length piece that the author is currently working on with Marquette Law School Professor Chad Oldfather. [read post]
According to the author of Proposal 2, Vermont constitutional law professor Peter Teachout, the amendment makes no change to substantive rights. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  It is the second most popular recreational drug in the U.S. after alcohol, despite being the number-one cause of preventable death. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Indeed, given the history of race discrimination in voting that led to the Twenty-Fourth Amendment’s adoption, laws that aim to deter or punish voting should be especially suspect.The Jones majority nonetheless rejected the Twenty-Fourth Amendment challenge because, it said, the Florida law doesn’t punish voting; it punishes the underlying criminal act that led to a felony conviction in the first place. [read post]