Search for: "People v. Mays (1998)"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 1,887
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2010, 7:17 am
He may set the fashion. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
The UK Government has relaunched the campaign to overhaul the Human Rights Act 1998 in an attempt to counter what Secretary of State for Justice Dominic Raab has called “wokery and political correctness. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am
Very few people would disagree that a valid reason for awarding punitive damages is to compensate the injured person for the indignity of the perpetrator’s act and that is reason enough to allow the claim to proceed against the estate. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
While a Canadian court may give deference to the rules set by the seller, how closely a seller needs to follow those rules is not yet clear. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:32 am
It's chock full of analysis of the Bebchuk v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 4:00 am
Consider the Supreme Court’s recent judgment in Groia v Law Society of Upper Canada 2018 SCC 27. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 6:41 am
Clerkship Judge Barrett clerked for Justice Scalia in the 1998 Term. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
MANRIQUEZ, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 3:29 am
As the court notes in State v. [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 5:15 am
The case Stewart v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 3:08 am
Citing Fedele v Seybert, 250 AD2d 519 [1st Dept 1998], and other Appellate Division cases, Justice Singh states that since Section 1104-a’s enactment, common-law dissolution claims have been sustained only in the most egregious circumstances, in which the majority was accused of systematic looting of corporate assets in flagrant disregard of the rights of the minority shareholders. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:39 am
In Flanagan v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 3:29 am
As the court notes in State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 2:48 am
We may act on their behalf with leave of the Court. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:08 pm
In Wheaton v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:00 am
Every time judges solicit funds for any cause there is always the risk that those that appear before the court may suspect that the judge may be affected by the resulting financial support.[96] A “system of justice based on how much money you gave or raised for the judge before whom you are appearing cannot sustain public trust, and inevitably the public will believe about the judiciary what they believe about politics: money is what determines results”.[97] If… [read post]
UK Information Commissioner’s Office released a New Draft Employment Guidance for Monitoring at Work
28 Nov 2022, 1:01 am
It notes that, due to the imbalance of power within the employment context, workers may feel that they have no choice but to consent to monitoring, which undermines the concept of a “freely given” consent. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:37 am
The British people expect us to do whatever it takes to stop the boats, and that is precisely what this Government will deliver”. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 11:39 am
Twombly and Ashcroft v. [read post]
