Search for: "People v. Price" Results 1421 - 1440 of 4,383
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2020, 3:31 am by SHG
Yet, at this moment of racial obsession, Nike stands with its customers, even if it hasn’t reduced the price of its sneakers. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
"In one of the most famous law review articles ever written, Robert Bork, then a law professor, compared constitutionally protecting the non-textual right to privacy to people raising constitutional objections to paying higher prices for electricity from a public utility. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:05 am
[This isn't surprising considering Herrera, but one of the Houston courts of appeals flirted with this understanding in a case called Telshow v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Representatives Kevin Brady (R-Texas) and Richard Neal (D-Mass.) argued for replacing the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP), an amendment to the Social Security Act that reduces payments for people whose careers involved work in both the public and private sectors. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 9:05 pm by Jasmine Harris
” This concept may seem sufficiently broad to allow most plaintiffs’ lawyers recovery of fees, but it certainly does not have that valence after the Supreme Court’s decision in Buckhannon Board and Home Care v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 12:46 am by Arina Shulga
According to the well-known to all U.S. legal professionals case, SEC v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 1:36 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Supreme Court Ruling a Blow to Genetic Privacy The Supreme Court's 5-4 Maryland v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 4:14 am
(iii) Introduce a new program to provide discounted pricing. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 6:27 pm by Andrew Koppelman
”  That of course returns us to the world of Hopkins v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 12:58 pm by Rekha Arulanantham
Alongside this impressive advocacy, the Law Center was litigating a class action to aid those imprisoned at Tamms (Westefer v. [read post]
The majority opinion also concluded that sexual orientation discrimination constitutes actionable gender stereotyping, held to be unlawful under Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 11:21 pm
Down-on-their-luck David & Son, with hungry counsel, v. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 4:40 am by INFORRM
The exceptional advocacy of the lawyers involved in the case of Indigenous People Maya Kaqchikel from Sumpango v. [read post]