Search for: "RAY v. RAY" Results 1421 - 1440 of 3,184
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Walter Olson
High times at the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service [Luke Rosiak, Examiner via Jim Harper, Cato] 6th Circuit: In ruling company’s suit against union to be unfair labor practice, NLRB breezed past First Amendment issues [NLRB v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:22 am by Ken White
Doctors then x-rayed Eckert again; no narcotics were found. 8. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 12:31 am by Orin Kerr
The ER doctor ordered an X-ray, which produced nothing, and then conducted a digital rectal exam over Eckert’s objection. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 12:02 pm by Tom Smith
Circuit's  Judge Janice Rogers Brown taking down the Obamacare contraceptive mandate in Gilardi v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 3:58 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Notwithstanding numerous amendments to the statute since Doe v Pataki, the Court of Appeals has consistently held that SORA, " is not a penal statute and the registration requirement is not a criminal sentence. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
Knott One Danger of Talking to the Press about a Pending Lawsuit Is Being Sued for Defamation (See Jacobs v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 6:06 am by Amy Howe
  He describes the case as “rais[ing] an important test of . . . [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm by Schachtman
. *** These plaques, though apparent on X‑ray, are not associated with any disability. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:19 pm
This question related to whether the combination product is protected by the amended patent and stems from the idea advanced by Actavis and by Arnold J in Actavis v Sanofi that the combination product may need to embody a separate inventive advance. [read post]