Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 21,162
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2010, 9:57 am
Relying in part on the only U.S. court of appeals case to address the application of § 215(a)(3) to state law, Sapperstein v. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 10:58 am
Ban of sale to minors and labeling requirements not narrowly tailored to meet compelling state interest. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 11:56 am
I've been meaning to look at the case of Paulin v Paulin [2008] EWCA Civ 900 in detail for some while, but other things have got in the way.The Facts: The only "obvious asset" available to satisfy the wife's financial claims was a sum of about £1,088,000, representing the proceeds of sale of a property that had been used briefly as a matrimonial home and then, following the husband's departure, by the wife and children as a home. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
In Dinnen v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 3:44 am
Over at Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr questions the vitality of Kyllo v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 5:17 pm
(Dorris v TXD Services, LP, DArk, 96 EPD ¶44,581) While on active military duty, employee gets word he has been terminated. [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
The Supreme Court noted that, under the doctrine of patent exhaustion, 'the initial authorised sale of a patented item terminates all patent rights to that item' (Quanta Computer Inc. v LG Electronics Inc.): the rationale behind this rule is that, once a patentee has received his reward through the sale of the patented item, he has no further right to restrain the use or enjoyment of it (United States v Univis Lens Co.). [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:37 am
However, Meril provided instructions to its exhibitor, stating that sales of the devices outside of the U.S. could be solicited. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:37 am
However, Meril provided instructions to its exhibitor, stating that sales of the devices outside of the U.S. could be solicited. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:37 am
However, Meril provided instructions to its exhibitor, stating that sales of the devices outside of the U.S. could be solicited. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:41 am
State v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 4:00 pm
In Budlong v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 6:04 am
Ctr. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 1:06 pm
Credit Managers Ass'n of California v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 1:06 pm
Credit Managers Ass'n of California v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 5:20 am
" Reese v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 7:49 am
ESRT Empire State Building, L.L.C. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 12:01 pm
By Dennis Crouch Gunn v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 9:53 am
Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that pharmaceutical sales representatives were "outside salespersons" exempt from the overtime requirements of the FLSA. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 10:42 am
Brandt Revocable Trust v. [read post]
