Search for: "State v. Grays"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 1,988
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2011, 8:00 am
v=mlWKptW74CY&feature=player_embedded#! [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 9:36 am
Gogol's vision is not so much the police state as it is the table of ranks (P and V print one in the intro) where except for the very bottom (and the very top?) [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
United States. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 9:06 am
(Daily.2016.Professors) Tristan Gray–Le Coz and Charles Duan, Apply It to the USPTO: Review of the Implementation of Alice v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 7:04 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:15 am
In the case of Barach v University of New South Wales [2011] NSWSC 431 the Supreme Court of New South Wales gave the claimant permission to serve libel proceedings on a defendant in the United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 6:30 pm
(Daily.2016.Professors) Tristan Gray–Le Coz and Charles Duan, Apply It to the USPTO: Review of the Implementation of Alice v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:21 pm
But as was stated in Re S, there is no presumptive priority between ECHR rights. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:06 am
United States, 549 F. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm
Another case brought by Ms Kaschke was dealt with by Stadlen J on 29 March 2010, Kaschke v Gray [2010] EWHC 690 (QB) The case of Baturina v Times Newspapers (see the decision of Eady J [2010] EWHC 696 (QB)) is the subject of a comment on the Hold the Front Page website by Nigel Hanson of solicitors Foot Anstey. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
(Inovia) (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) (Patently-O) (Patent Law Practice Center) USPTO/AIPLA Roundtable Report: Chinese utility models and design patents (IPKat) FTC report gives NPEs a new name (PAE), recommends that Courts and the PTO improve patent notice and damages (Patently-O) Uncle Sam v False Patent Marking (PatLit) Challenging USPTO decisions in the Courts (Patently-O) Decrease in new false marking cases filed post In re BP Lubricants (Gray on Claims) US Patents… [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 1:49 pm
The work of Leibniz was more directed to differential calculus and Newton more concerned with integration.Other work of Leibniz pre-saged much work of Alan Turing, which is curiously cited in Ten Law Professors’ Brief in Trading Technologies v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 3:23 pm
Specifically, they stated that their plan was a private plan under a test set out in Alley v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 10:09 am
(See Hamric v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 8:29 am
” Shelby County, Alabama v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:57 am
Sibelius), some achieve moment (Miranda v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 6:10 am
Regulation Best Interest v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 12:51 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:19 pm
English cases in this category included: Smith v ADFVN ([2008] EWHC 1797 (QB)); Clift v Clarke [2011] EWHC 1164 (QB); and El Diwany v Hansen and Others ([2011] EWHC 2077 (QB)) . [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 3:26 am
Gray's expert testimony, and there existed contrary testimony by Dr. [read post]
