Search for: "State v. Katz"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 1,564
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 10:42 am
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 4:26 pm
The Minister of State for Media, Data and Digital Infrastructure has also announced an Online Advertising Programme will review regulatory frameworks of paid digital advertising. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 4:03 pm
Katz in a widely read blog entitled Access Copyright v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 8:44 am
A "search" violates a reasonable expectation of privacy under the Supreme Court's decision in Katz v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 11:45 am
That is still partly true: The canonical cases are often 1960s-vintage (in Fourth Amendment law, think Mapp, Katz, Terry, etc.). [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:42 pm
He stated that it wasn't bad as he had expected, given the war-time circumstances: "We have 75 students, and we haven't had to admit any women. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:06 pm
I observed the same in Oracle v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 7:20 am
It is as if the Supreme Court had ruled in Katz v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
’’ Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 9:00 pm
Jon Katz. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 5:21 am
Years ago, the Supreme Court in Katz v. [read post]
20 Oct 2024, 9:05 pm
Constitution, which states that “the executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 4:07 am
Update: As brought to my attention by Walter Katz, the Court of Appeals decision holding the South Carolina only requires a single brake light was subsequently reversed by the South Carolina Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
This post comes to us from Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 4:00 pm
Jon Katz. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 5:16 am
But you would have had to wait until 1967 for the Supreme Court, in Katz v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 6:12 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Wednesday, June 13, 2018 Tags: Executive Compensation, Long-Term value, Repurchases, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder value, Taxation Marking to Market Versus Taking to Market Posted by Guillaume Plantin (Sciences Po) and Jean Tirole (University of Toulouse & IAST) , on Wednesday, June 13, 2018 Tags: Accounting, Agency costs, Contracts, Fair values, Information… [read post]
