Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 1421 - 1440 of 20,244
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2017, 1:34 pm by Josh Blackman
The dissent’s charges were based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Kleindienst v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 12:53 pm by Tejinder Singh
Of course, finding clever ways to avoid the merits is less important in the Supreme Court, where the justices can avoid any question simply by denying certiorari — but the ability to resort to jurisdictional safety valves still comes in handy from time to time in hot-button cases (think Hollingsworth v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 6:11 am by Antitrust Today
Akzo argued that the General Court had incorrectly interpreted the decision of the Court of Justice in Case 155/79 AM&S Europe v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:11 pm by Steve Vladeck
” The question the justices will consider next Monday in Wilson v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:32 pm by David Ettinger
  The justices will soon be back in the courtroom as the court has posted its September calendar. [read post]
10 May 2010, 10:55 pm by Adam Wagner
However, last month a further blow was struck to open justice with the reversal by the Ministry of Justice of the judgment in Clayton v Clayton [2006] EWCA Civ 878, in which the Court of Appeal held that reporting restrictions in cases involving children only lasted until the end of a trial. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:11 am by Woodrow Pollack
I am still digesting the 71 pages (which includes the main opinion authored by Justice Kennedy, as well Justice Stevens' opinion (joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer and Sotomayor) concurring in the judgment, and Justice Breyer's opinion (joined in part by Justice Scalia) concurring in the judgment).In the interim, my colleague Michael J. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:01 pm by Andrew Siegel
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Parker Drilling Management Service, Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:28 pm by emagraken
Two judgement were released this week by the BC Supreme Court demonstrating that formal settlement offers made late in the litigation process are still capable of triggering costs consequences. [read post]