Search for: "US v. Green"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 6,075
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2019, 9:23 am
Wilson v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 3:52 am
” We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 7:27 am
” * Hyman v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 11:13 am
People involved with numerous federal programs frequently ask me “how does Congress expect us to do our jobs with this level of funding? [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 7:43 am
Southern District Judge Nelson Roman and Magistrate Judge Henry Pitman recently addressed two such issues in Barbini v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
This appeal will consider whether the inherent jurisdiction can be used to order the summary re-relocation of a child where there is a statutory scheme and where the substantive and procedural characteristics of that scheme are avoided. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm
More recently, Gregory Shill of the University of Iowa College of Law describes in The Atlantic how the law effectively compels the use of the automobile, repeating the 1977 SCOTUS reference in Wooley v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm
During the Conference, lawyer Amal Clooney and foreign secretary Jeremy Hunt criticised Donald Trump’s attacks on media, saying the US president has emboldened individuals who wish to persecute journalists. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 9:00 am
In total, we count there have been 35 such cases, starting with Green Lane Products Ltd v PMS International Group plc ([2007] EWHC 1712 (Pat)) in 2007 right through to PulseOn Oy v Garmin (Europe) Limited [2019] EWCA Civ 138 earlier this year. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 3:51 am
At Modern Democracy, Michael Parsons elaborates on the implications of Rucho v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 3:30 am
"** Reeves v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 12:15 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 1:11 pm
Under United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 5:36 am
"Addressing a motion for summary judgment on behalf of NYPD and certain of its named staff members [City Defendants], the Appellate Division said that an action brought under the NYCHRL must be analyzed under both the framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, 411 US 792, and under the newer mixed motive framework, which imposes a lesser burden on a plaintiff opposing such a motion," citing Persaud v Walgreens Co., 161 AD3d 1019. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 5:36 am
"Addressing a motion for summary judgment on behalf of NYPD and certain of its named staff members [City Defendants], the Appellate Division said that an action brought under the NYCHRL must be analyzed under both the framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, 411 US 792, and under the newer mixed motive framework, which imposes a lesser burden on a plaintiff opposing such a motion," citing Persaud v Walgreens Co., 161 AD3d 1019. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 3:41 am
This was clarified in L’ Oreal SA v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 6:02 pm
Please join us in congratulating this year's trivia masterminds:1st Place: F.U.C.T. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 12:39 pm
(OCA, para.8-9) The OCA relied on the 2014 Supreme Court of Canada decision in Bhasin v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:03 pm
The leafy greens industry is aggressively addressing approaches to prevent future outbreaks. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:22 am
In any case, following the success of Baker v. [read post]
