Search for: "United States v. Choice" Results 1421 - 1440 of 6,472
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2008, 7:29 am
The most avid proponents of the post-War Amendments undoubtedly intended them to remove all legal distinctions among `all persons born or naturalized in the United States. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:30 am by Matthew Flinn
Mr Malcolm had made a conscious choice to remain on the Segregation Unit at HMP Frankland by refusing to move to any other prison wing. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:30 am by Nick Farr
Needless to say, any time the United States Supreme Supreme Court issues a case involving preemption, we here at Abnormal Use pay close attention. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 9:16 am by Paul T. Moura
Aug. 24, 2017), the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York ordered MF Global Holdings Ltd. and Allied World Assurance Co. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 4:43 pm by Eugene Volokh
But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other… [read post]
13 May 2022, 8:40 am by JURIST Staff
A bill to codify abortion rights was defeated Wednesday in the United States Senate. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 3:40 pm
Yet, on July 25, 2020, Y. traveled with M.D. to the United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 12:59 pm
  No big surprise to us, since the United States Supreme Court held Mississippi ex rel. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:37 am by Hannah Buxbaum
  Wouldn't there be a U.S. interest in deterring such fraud, reducing private enforcement costs within the United States? [read post]
Ten Republican attorneys general (AGs) filed a multi-state amicus brief Monday with the US Supreme Court in the Pennsylvania mail-in ballot challenge, Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 5:43 am by Lauren E. Koster
 Moreover, the Court found that the Husband had substantial resources and frequently traveled to the United States, therefore did not show that it would be a hardship for him to travel to New Jersey to litigate this matter. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:19 am by Big Tent Democrat
The Tea Partiers obviously have no true knowledge or understanding of the history of the United States and the Constitution. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 5:47 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
If you don't have a venue statute likeSection 1400, you get the kind of litigation experiencesthat are set out in the amici briefs.The -- the law professor's brief noted thatthere's a single judge in the United States that hasone-quarter of all patent cases in the United States onhis docket. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:21 am by James Beck - Guest
  In Geier, but not in Williamson, the United States government had supported preemption on the ground that allowing the state-law claims would conflict with agency objectives. [read post]