Search for: "United States v. Minor" Results 1421 - 1440 of 6,288
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2020, 8:43 am by Paula Lombardi
Recently, two cases State of Netherlands v Urgenda (December 20, 2019) and Juliana v. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 12:15 am
Jarkesy, 2024 WL 3187811 (June 27, 2024), the United States Supreme Court held that when the Securities and Exchange Commission seeks civil penalties against a defendant for securities fraud, the Seventh Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 6:53 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The most recent affirmative action case before the Supreme Court of the United States is Fisher v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 7:46 pm
  It also demands that with regard to "reverse Batson" challenges, the defense speaks with one voice, as illustrated in United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 5:15 am
The ambiguous and often tragic world of alleged and actual sex offenders - running the gamut from harmless experimentation and role-playing to sinister preying on defenseless victims - is brought into sharp relief in the Second Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 11:00 am by Jeffrey Brown
The Sixth Circuit recently affirmed the denial of a motion to suppress in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 8:55 pm
The controversial condition of polygraph testing as a component of sex offender mental health treatment had been approved by the Second Circuit in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 6:32 pm by Robert L Abell
  This result the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled recently in Longaberger Company v Kolt, No 08-4432 (November 16, 2009), was appropriate "equitable relief. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 9:57 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In a recent decision by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in the case of Caserta v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 10:45 am
His mission to the United States will culminate in a report that will be presented to the U.N. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 12:05 pm
United States, 523 U.S. 224, 226-27 (1998) arguments. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 3:11 am by Rosalind English
There was no doubt that the hospital owed the second applicant a duty of care (unlike the first applicant who was excluded under the principle in X(minors) v Bedfordshire County Council). [read post]