Search for: "United States v. North"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 5,467
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
United States, an infamously murky 2006 decision on Clean Water Act jurisdiction. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 9:44 am
United States, 60 Treas. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:57 am
§ 22B-2; state statute must yield to the FAA under the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution). [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 12:45 pm
Trump and Hawaii v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
United States) and the other (Bolling v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 4:28 pm
Few books can get you from the rainy coast of Newfoundland over 19th-century Holstein straight to sunny Queensland and back to the North of Pennsylvania, while telling stories of a retired MI5 agent, the largest Ponzi scheme in history, a company founded by the 41st President of the United States, the aftermath of the First Gulf War, and the collapse of the Federal Bank of Australia. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 8:30 am
- England & Wales, North Ireland or Scotland?) [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 8:30 am
- England & Wales, North Ireland or Scotland?) [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 2:45 pm
When the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) ruled in the case of Kelo v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:33 am
Groves, Sr.Crossmann Communities of North Carolina v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 3:33 pm
It mirrors the “reprehensibility” factor described by the United States Supreme Court in BMW of North American, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:56 am
United States Fire Ins. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 6:43 am
 After the Court of Appeals concluded in that case, DaimlerChrysler Services North America, LLC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am
United States, the Facebook threats case, continues. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:54 am
It heard oral arguments for the second time in Johnson v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 10:49 am
The decision in State v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:26 am
Supreme Court’s 1984 ruling in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am
Such a statute could read: No state or locality may rely upon the new constitutional standard for substantial nexus articulated by the United States Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
