Search for: "Williams v. Federal District Court" Results 1421 - 1440 of 3,645
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2016, 9:44 am by H. Scott Leviant
U-Haul Co. of California (Sept. 16, 2016), the Second Appellate District, Division Seven, affirmed the trial Court's ruling that U-Haul could not assert an arbitration agreement to compel the plaintiffs to individually arbitrate whether they qualified as “aggrieved employee[s],” to determine in arbitration whether they had standing to pursue a PAGA claim.The Court agreed with Williams v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Certainly relevant is that the Supreme Court in 1973 (in the San Antonio Independent School District v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 11:28 am by HR Hero Alerts
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas because it is known as a “rocket docket” in which complaints proceed to trial quickly, that’s not indicative of a potential victory, according to William E. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 5:34 am
The district court has discretion to decide whether to depart at sentencing, and this court will reverse only if the district court abused its discretion. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 4:45 am by Amy Howe
McManus, in which the Court ruled that a three-judge district court must be convened in constitutional challenges to the apportionment of congressional districts. [read post]
20 Aug 2016, 8:40 am by Peter S. Lubin and Vincent L. DiTommaso
At trial, the federal district court concluded that the Conour Firm was entitled to some $775,000 under principles of quantum meruit, and that ACF had priority of payment over the victims. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 10:01 pm by Barry Barnett
The district court rejected that position as a matter of law, as do we. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
**Other decisions in which a public employee's right to free speech was considered include Tytor v Laramie County School District, CA10 [unpublished]; Jeffries v Harleston, CA2, 52 F3d 9; and Barnard v Jackson County, CA8, 43 F3d 1218. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 8:58 pm by Patent Docs
For example, Amgen's lawsuit against Sandoz was one of the first in which a district court and the Federal Circuit had the opportunity to interpret sections of that statute (see "Federal Circuit Decides Amgen v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am by Chris Castle
 Of course, if the Obama Administration intends to request Senate confirmation of Hesse and William J. [read post]