Search for: "Young v. State"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 8,835
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2020, 5:30 am
Apple vote appeared to dissuade Judge Gonzalez Rogers from considering Epic v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 12:25 pm
Pa. 1991) (outlining the history and development of the two-schools doctrine under Pennsylvania law); Young v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:29 am
First up: the state-court case of Shahrokh Mireskandari v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 4:25 am
Pa. 1991) (outlining the history and development of the two-schools doctrine under Pennsylvania law); Young v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:26 pm
In 1975, Ginsburg argued at the Supreme Court on behalf of Stephen Wiesenfeld, who wanted to obtain Social Security benefits that would allow him to stay home with his young son after his wife, a schoolteacher, died in childbirth. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:13 pm
In 1996, she wrote the decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 7:49 am
Young v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 11:20 am
Very young. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:03 pm
[v] Thinking we would need to work our way through the details of complying with the current statutory conflict-of-interest safe harbors of Chapter 607, we consulted with Gary Teblum, my partner who was active in the recent revision of Chapter 607. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 11:02 am
Black v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Exempting only young people would, as just suggested, constitute an abridgment in the eyes of the panel. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Brunson, Addressing Hate: Georgia, the IRS, and the Ku Klux Klan, (July 31, 2020).Tanner Bean & Robin Fretwell Wilson, The Administrative State as a New Front in the Culture War: Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 9:30 pm
Congratulations to Samantha Barbas, University at Buffalo Law, on her receipt of an NEH grant for a "sociolegal history of New York Times Co. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 1:30 pm
Last summer, in Trump v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 11:26 am
Paxton 19-1441Issue: Whether, under Ex parte Young, a state official is a proper defendant in a federal declaratory judgment challenge under the supremacy clause to the validity of a self-enforcing state statute, if the official with authority to enforce the statute has not yet overtly threatened enforcement. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:16 am
MAGARINO, Petitioner, v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
In Robinson v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 2:41 pm
In CCLA v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 10:00 am
Answer: I have always been interested in gender inequality since a very young age. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 4:21 pm
Puttaswamy v. [read post]
