Search for: "Bush v. Person" Results 1441 - 1460 of 2,109
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2012, 1:46 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Disenfranchisement may also skew political processes by distorting group representation (as it arguably did in a few election campaigns in the United States, most notably the 2000 Bush v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 10:08 am by Erin Miller
Bush’s 2005 nominee who had served as his personal lawyer. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Bush issued an anticipatory veto notice saying, in essence, “don’t bother. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46)   Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am by Jeh Johnson
Both the Bush and Obama administrations construed the 2002 AUMF to provide the domestic legal authority for armed conflict against Saddam Hussein’s regime in Iraq, and for military force against armed militia groups that sought to drive U.S. forces out of Iraq after the regime fell.14 I personally do not believe the 2001 AUMF covers armed conflict against ISIS in Iraq and Syria, or, as some have argued, that the 2002 AUMF for Iraq can be stretched to have justified lethal… [read post]
14 May 2010, 9:05 am by Erin Miller
” During this century, cases like Bush v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:43 am by Lyle Denniston
  Padilla has asked the Supreme Court to review that ruling (Lebron, et al., v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:29 am by Lyle Denniston
  That was the somewhat contradictory outcome in Ashcroft v. al-Kidd (docket 10-98). [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:00 pm by Josh Blackman
Whether a person wants to speak out is his or her personal decision, especially for those who lack the benefits of academic and other types of tenure. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 6:49 am by admin
[James] Carville says they don’t want another rotten decision on their scorecard —  they’ve already got Bush v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
But two things are clear: 1) the Court's explicit approval of Bush v. [read post]