Search for: "DOES, 1-20"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 27,658
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2012, 10:32 am
In a 6-1 decision announced on September 20, 2012, the Supreme Court of Ohio recognized a limited exception to the general rule that a terminated employee must notify his or her employer of the employee’s intent to file a retaliatory discharge lawsuit under Ohio Revised Code Section 4123.90 within 90 days after the date of the employee’s termination, and held that trial courts may delay the start of the 90-day notification period in a workers’ compensation… [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
Answer #1 Yes. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 2:45 am
The first examiner indicated that in his opinion claim 1 now on file suffers from the same deficiency as claim 1 as originally filed. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 12:59 am
20. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 3:30 pm
— “(1) IN GENERAL. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 6:27 am
Jan. 20, 2022) [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 2:39 pm
What does this mean? [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 2:39 pm
What does this mean? [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 10:57 pm
Meanwhile, in late February 2010, Lannett submitted its own NDA (NDA No. 201517) to FDA for Morphine Sulfate Oral Solution, 100 mg per 5 mL (20 mg per mL), which NDA was not granted a 6-month priority review as was Roxane’s NDA. [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 12:39 pm
”[5] Legal arguments against plain packaging laws have been raised on the grounds that it violates Art 20 of TRIPS, 1994. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 9:49 am
See, e.g., Doe 1 v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 8:37 am
§274a.12(b)(20), a person lawfully employed under A-3, E-1,E-2,E-3,G-5, H-1B, H-2A/B, H-3, I, J-1, L-1, O-1/O-2, P-1/P-2/P-3, R or TN status who timely files an application for extension consistent with 8 C.F.R. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 3:18 pm
Typical benefits reimbursed are: 1. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 6:30 am
He is an expert in employer communication systems and helps employers reduce their workers comp costs by 20% to 50%. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:00 am
They are: 1. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 6:18 pm
Feb. 20, 2014).Issues[1] Claim construction and Infringement[Whether the district court erred in finding that claim 1 was infringed because it] construed the claim term “fine granules having an average particle diameter of 400 μm or less” . . . [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 7:06 am
(WEDNESDAY, 17 MARCH 2021)BREAKING NEWS: G 1/21 - Exclusion and objection of the chairman of the Enlarged Board, but not of other members (THURSDAY, 20 MAY 2021) [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 10:09 pm
Appellants filed their revised brief on June 1, 2021 in which they argue that the FTC does not have the authority to impose some of the remedies that the FTC has imposed. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 12:34 pm
Does the mechanism of the lump-sum settlement, N.J.S.A., 34:15-20, ie. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 6:52 pm
Bracewell, 20 S.W.3d 14, 22 (Tex. [read post]