Search for: "Does 1 - 10" Results 1441 - 1460 of 43,731
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2006, 9:10 pm
Here’s two things you need to know about software patent lawsuits: 1) they only exist when the defendant has money, and 2) software patents and open source are not incompatible just because RedHat (or anyone else) says that they are. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 12:23 pm by Kenneth Vercammen NJ Law Blog
If taxable estate isreported on line 3(b), enter the amount from page 1 line 15 of the 2001 Form 706 on line 10(b) . . . 10(a) 10(b)11. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 8:00 am by The Health Law Firm
  You refer to anyone else as fat, stupid, lazy, "dumb blondes" or any other demeaning label.10. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
 [10] Hence, the Board comes to the conclusion that the subject-matter of claim 1 as granted, i.e. claim 1 of the present main request, does not extend beyond the content of the application as filed.Should you wish to download the whole decision (T 860/09), just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 7:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
House Bill 4434 accomplishes several things:(1) The UTSA piece is unremarkable, but it does require the identification of the subject trade secret "with sufficient particularly under the circumstances of the case" before beginning discovery. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 8:32 pm
If your firm does, tell them to visit Paul Caron's TaxProfBlog. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 6:51 am
LEXIS 142 (April 10, 2007): We recognize that the Wardlow analysis ultimately turns on whether the Defendant's flight was provoked or unprovoked. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 7:12 am by Czepiga Daly Pope & Perri LLC
Does it cover adult day care, respite care for the primary caregiver and hospice services? [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 9:59 am by John Jascob
Over the last 10 years, Watchdog’s analysis shows that 10-K/As account for less than 1 percent of initial disclosures overall. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:38 am
May 10, 2012): In Chambers, we held that evidence of de minimis injury does not necessarily foreclose a Fourth Amendment excessive-force claim, that the force alleged was not reasonable under the circumstances, but that defendants were entitled to qualified immunity because the state of the law in August 2005 was such that a reasonable officer could have believed that as long as he did not cause more than de minimis injury to an arrestee, he would not violate the Fourth Amendment.… [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:51 pm by Jeffrey J. Randa
This issue only arises in a relative minority of cases, and, when it does, it is usually quite easy to handle. [read post]