Search for: "Does 1-35" Results 1441 - 1460 of 9,563
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
 The bill would make a proposed project ineligible for streamlining under SB 35 if the Native American Tribe does not agree that no potential tribal cultural resource would be affected by the proposed development. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:48 am by Dave
  How does one actually occupy a metal staircase? [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:48 am by Dave
  How does one actually occupy a metal staircase? [read post]
 The bill would make a proposed project ineligible for streamlining under SB 35 if the Native American Tribe does not agree that no potential tribal cultural resource would be affected by the proposed development. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 9:46 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
SEB (2011), when the Court held that induced infringement under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 10:13 am by Robert Chesney
The relevant article of the 1977 Protocol states in pertinent part:  Article 35 — Basic rules  1. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:48 am by MBA
Passage of the tax bill in its proposed form does not appear, at this time, to be a certainty. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
”  Claim 1 includes two elements, both written in means-plus-function (MPF) language. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 12:14 am
The subsidy will be available to any employee involuntarily terminated (except those severed because of gross misconduct, to whom COBRA does not apply) from employment between September 1, 2008, and December 31, 2009. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 8:42 am by Dennis Crouch
Regardless of efficiency or workload concerns, the PTO’s rulemaking authority “does not include a power to revise clear statutory terms. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
For example, I asked:Query 1: Does federal public accommodations law forbid sex discrimination? [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 11:43 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” Oral Argument at 10:51–58, 13:35–44,http://oralarguments.cafc.uscourts.gov/default.aspx? [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 8:05 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
§§ 1051(b), 1058, 1059, 1062(b), 1063, 1064, and 1126(d), or 35 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:35 am by Ben
”The proportionality testIt is argued in the letter that clause 35 does not adhere to the proportionality test found within EU law and the ECHR. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 7:03 pm by Bill Marler
For those that are prosecuted, does the punishment fit the crime? [read post]