Search for: "Fast v. Fast" Results 1441 - 1460 of 6,847
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2017, 1:00 pm by EEM
Reinhardt: "The government forces us to participate in ripping apart a family" (ImmigrationProf Blog, May 2017) [text]The Justice Department’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari in IRAP v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 10:57 am
"Still, by saving thousands of dollars in potential fines, and tens of thousands in deductibles and co-insurance, it sure seems that these folks have found something that works for them. and the fact that their ranks have swelled so fast and so far is pretty good proof of its appeal and effectiveness.Original content copyright © InsureBlog [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 6:42 am
"... and he suggested that many of them find that the classes are 'too fast' for them at such high-rank institutions, and thus prefer to go to lower-ranked, 'slower-track schools.'"From Lyle Denniston's description of the oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 6:01 pm by matthewgardner
  (Good case to read for explaining the law.)Moral of the Story:Don’t try and pull a fast one on your grandma. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 The court concluded that regardless of whether or not the arbitrator erred in finding that Plaintiff's denial of having thrown punches precluded a finding of remorse, the record showing minor injuries to the student, and a separate finding by the arbitrator that Plaintiff's actions put the student at serious risk of harm, supports imposing the penalty of dismissal based on the Plaintiff's use of excessive force.Citing Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School… [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 7:30 am by Unknown
"Blog posts & press:Communication 56/2018: V.A. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 10:00 pm
Post By Blog Staff In a decision on August 15, 2017, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) reversed and remanded the district court’s decision in Visual Memory LLC v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 7:41 am by Mark Summerfield
  Second, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a rare decision (Enfish LLC v Microsoft Corporation, appeal no. 15-1244 [PDF, 604kB]) finding that a computer-implemented invention is not ‘abstract’, and is therefore patent-eligible.The USPTO’s updated guidelines require examiners to provide more detail in their rejections, to provide distinct rejections for every claim, and to provide more reasoning when maintaining rejections in the fact of… [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 2:04 pm by Bart Torvik
For example, here is the Delaware Supreme Court, in Gantler v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:07 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
The Ontario Court of Appeal Clarifies Rules for the Division of Property in Buttar v. [read post]