Search for: "Larry v. State"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 1,801
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2018, 2:28 pm
(Larry Catá Backer, Emasculated Men, Effeminate Law in the United States, Zimbabwe and Malaysia, Yale Journal of Law & Feminism17(1):1-63 (2005, pp. )1-2).Further thoughts followed here, here, here, here, here, and here. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:15 am
Plakhov v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:16 am
But the Larry Tribe fact pattern would have been labeled “EASY. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:35 pm
Specifically, in appointing the Special Master, the New Jersey Supreme Court ordered a review of the legal standard for the admissibility of eyewitness testimony known as the “Manson test,” established by the United States Supreme Court in 1977 and fully embraced by 48 out of 50 states, including New Jersey in 1988 in State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
Second Circuit decision, Gates v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
These U.S. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 8:09 am
(Dickerson v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 2:32 am
White v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am
On 14 July 2023, the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by the Chinese state broadcaster’s international division, China Global Television Network (CGTN), against a £125,000 fine handed down by Ofcom, Star China Media Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Office of Communications [2023] EWCA Civ 843. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:35 am
See Larry Catá Backer, And a Treaty to Bind them All—On Prospects and Obstacles to Moving from the GPs to a Multilateral Treaty Framework, a Preliminary Assessment, Law at the End of the Day, July 3, 2014.It is in this context that the insights of John Ruggie may be especially important. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 8:19 am
Precisely because Bush v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
” Blum v. [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 10:07 am
Under the Supreme Court’s seminal decision in Strickland v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 11:57 pm
Supreme Court's recent 5-4 ruling in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:32 pm
Davis v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:23 am
I think Professor Larry Hamermesh got it right in a recent article that considers the issue of consent from the perspective of reasonable investor expectations. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 3:39 am
Franklin v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:30 am
According to Solum:[I]n Bradwell v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:00 am
For example, I previously quoted Professor Solum himself for the following proposition shared by most New Originalists: [I]n Bradwell v. [read post]
