Search for: "Locke v. State"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 3,517
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2015, 6:47 am
In Abdulahi v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:00 am
Solomon v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 6:08 am
Fedda v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 12:15 pm
In APPLE INC. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 3:14 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 9:22 am
In addition, shortly thereafter, the landlord received a "Notice of and Order to Remedy Violation" stating that his property was in violation of the New York State Building and Fire Code because it contained an inadequate number of smoke detectors and because there were improper locks on bedroom doors preventing egress in the event of a fire. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 4:09 am
” At the Lock Law Blog, Ryan Lockman looks at Hernández v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 6:16 pm
This case -- involving inaccessible polling places in New York City -- tells us how.The case is Disabled in Action v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 11:04 am
A recent case out of the Bay Area, Series AGI West Linn of Appian Group Investors DE LLC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 5:09 am
However, the appeals court said that McCleese can seek that the charges against him be dismissed based on the decision in People v. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 1:13 pm
Shenzhen Tange Li’an E-Commerce Co. v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 12:01 pm
The case, Yoder & Frey Auctioneers, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 3:30 am
” An insurer’s fraud sound and fury is often immersed in subjectivity. 3See Van Meter v. [read post]
14 May 2016, 7:40 am
Word on the street is that Korematsu v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 8:26 am
., v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 6:06 am
This case presents the rare victory for the inmate.The case is Elder v. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 10:04 am
” In contrast with the recent United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 6:01 am
Their argument is based on an unpublished NJ Appellate Division decision, Bass v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:53 am
Today is the one-year anniversary of the Supreme Court's devastating decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 4:26 am
Applicant Handal's argument that Section 2(c) is unconstitutional was mooted when the Supreme Court's ruling in Vidal v. [read post]
