Search for: "MATTER OF K A B"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 2,720
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
” (emphasis added by the board).[2.2.4] It follows from this that the appeal proceedings are confined to the subject-matter of the first instance proceedings and therefore that the statement of grounds of appeal should at least discuss this subject-matter. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:27 am
Gonda and Amanda K. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:50 pm
Wright & K. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 10:01 am
” The survey asked, “What is the first thing that comes to your mind when you hear the name ‘Charbucks,’ spelled C-H-A-R-B-U-C-K-S? [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
However, since the petition is in any event clearly unallowable, this matter need not be decided.[6] The petition was written in a highly emotive style and included a large volume of derogatory language, much of which (for example, “fabricating the decision”, “partiality”, “stolen patent”, “jealousy and outright bad faith”, “aggressive and corrupt”, and “fraud”) was excessive and without apparent basis in the petition. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 11:40 am
The Court found that this claim failed under both Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and Rule 12(b)(6). [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
As the Druckexemplar did in fact include page 6, and this was the legally binding text, the objections raised by the respondent-opponent under A 100(b) and A 123(3), based solely on the missing page 6, the appellant proprietor’s requests for correction under R 140 or amendment, as well as the ensuing discussion during the OPs before the Board concerning A 123(3)) and the Board’s finding above were from a substantive point of view legally unfounded (not having considered the… [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:07 am
This overview includes the following: * Regulatory & Other Changes in 2013 * Adviser Registration & Compliance * CFTC Regulation * Annual Compliance & Other Items * Annual Fund Matters * Annual Management Company Matters * Compliance Calendar **** Regulatory & Other Changes in 2013: Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”). [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 3:25 am
B. [read post]
30 Nov 2013, 4:06 pm
B., and P. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
No matter which of the two priority applications were taken into consideration, the newly filed drawings could not be accepted. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 7:32 am
Greetings from Virginia Beach y’all In what you all know is a familiar refrain at this point, “I really meant to write this awhile ago” blah blah blah. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am
B. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 9:06 am
Jack B. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
The enabling disclosure for this embodiment, in particular for the first part of feature b) and feature c) of claim 1, relies on the content of patent applications WO 00/46680 ([INC1]), US 09/378184 (INC2) and US 09/378220 (INC3) incorporated by reference. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
If the requirements regarding admissibility are met for at least one ground for opposition, the opposition is admissible as a whole (see T 212/97).[12] The explanations of the [opponent] regarding substantiation essentially consists in the following chain of arguments:(a) R 55 EPC 1973 does not provide that documents cited against [the opposed patent] have to be dated or that their date (Zeitrang) has to be indicated;(b) even if there was a requirement regarding [their] date, the dates… [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 3:24 am
Garrett's request that it produce all communications between the SEC and the GAO relating to accredited investor matters over the last 18 months. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
In the present case there is no doubt that requirements (a) and (b) have been met. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm
” The survey asked, “What is the first thing that comes to your mind when you hear the name ‘Charbucks,’ spelled C-H-A-R-B-U-C-K-S? [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
A further repetition of the process of Example 8 performed by the appellant, the experimental details of which were provided in Annex B of letter dated 8 March 2013, confirmed said conclusion. [read post]
