Search for: "Michigan v. United States"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 3,260
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
We affirmed their convictions in United States v. [read post]
28 May 2007, 4:49 pm
But the Supreme Court stated as early as United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 9:38 am
Michigan, 547 U.S. 586 (2006).U.S. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 11:37 am
Hawkins v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 9:51 am
On January 11, 2012, the United States Supreme Court for the first time recognized the so-called “ministerial exception” to workplace discrimination laws. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 4:48 am
” To supports its conclusion that “damage to property” includes “Medicaid overpayments wrongfully received,” the panel majority relied on a 1979 United States Supreme Court case, which stated that “[a] person whose property is diminished by a payment of money wrongfully induced is injured in his property. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 10:44 am
In their Michigan v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Supreme Court, on June 29, 2015, in a 5 to 4 ruling, held in Michigan v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 4:52 am
Amnesty International has released a report on the state of law enforcement in the United States, and it’s unattractive. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 5:10 am
Hearsay is not allowed as evidence in the United States, unless one of [a number of] exceptions applies to the particular statement being made. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:57 am
In 1976, in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 12:20 pm
United States, 277 U. [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 5:58 am
See, e.g., LLMD of Michigan Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 6:42 am
Times by Jeffrey Kayes discusses the possibility that Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano may weigh in on the Arizona statute at issue in United States Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 7:47 am
Stowers Chair in Law & Religion Michigan State University College of Law. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:54 am
United States (1928) and Goldman v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am
” At Vox, Ian Millhiser observes that in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 7:18 am
As a matter of politics, this invalid decision was the end of the story until 1980, when the Band was restored to federally recognized status.Interestingly, if my recollection is accurate, the State of Michigan did argue in the 1970s that the administratively terminated Michigan tribes had lost their status as tribes in U.S. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:14 am
In Fast v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:59 am
Michigan is considered to be among the worst states in the Union in providing legal services for indigents.This blog covered the problem last October when the Michigan Supreme Court reversed course in the Duncan v State of Michigan case, granting summary disposition to a constitutional challenge to our system of court appointed legal counsel. [read post]
