Search for: "Moore v. United States" Results 1441 - 1460 of 1,604
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2021, 7:46 am by Josh Blackman
Today the United States asks this court to reconsider and overrule its decision in Roe v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-8995, involves the truly obscure question of whether a period of supervised release for one offense is tolled during a period of pretrial confinement (that, upon conviction, would be credited to a defendant’s term of imprisonment for another offense). [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 2:07 pm by David Kopel
Cooley, General Principles of Constitutional Law 271 (2d ed. 1891) (discussing the implicit right to train with weapons)); United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:05 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Back at the scene of the deadly boat accident, divers found the bodies of two of the accident victims, and the United States Coast Guard sent a Jayhawk helicopter up and down the river to locate the third victim, whose body was not found in the capsized boat. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Vernelus, 2022 QCCA 138; 2022 SCC 53 (40072) Kasirer J.: “The Court is of the view that the appeal should be dismissed for the reasons given by Moore J.A. for the majority of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Hawaii: The so-called ‘Steven Tyler Act’, named after the lead singer of Aerosmith, will be considered in the state Senate Judiciary Committee. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm by Kraft Palmer Davies, PLLC
Gwinn stated that Hedges was an “excellent candidate” for treatment with an SCS, and referred him to physical medicine and rehabilitation specialist Glen James David, M.D. for a trial SCS. 14. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Moore, No. 07-3434 Denial of an application for habeas corpus from a conviction and sentence for gross sexual imposition and rape is affirmed where petitioner's Fifth Amendment guarantee against double jeopardy was not violated because the requisite high degree of necessity existed for a mistrial. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 9:17 am by The Charge
  A case titled Escobedo v. [read post]