Search for: "PFIZER INC "
Results 1441 - 1460
of 1,505
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2007, 4:31 am
Pfizer, Inc., 2007 WL 1228784, at *3 (S.D. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 2:48 pm
These included—to give just one example—the drug manufacturers Wyeth and Pfizer Inc., which paid $784.6 million to resolve federal and state claims that Wyeth knowingly reported false prices on two acid reflux drugs. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
I'm putting up some excerpts from my new draft article, The Law of Pseudonymous Litigation, hoping to get some feedback. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
Pfizer, Inc., 196 F. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 12:20 am
In case after case, Tessera Inc. relied on Jianman Qu's expert testimony and computer model to prove patent infringement against the chip industry's biggest companies. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:46 pm
Manufactured by Pfizer, Inc. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:49 pm
Manufactured by Pfizer, Inc. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:25 am
Pfizer Inc., Civ. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 4:02 am
Carter-Wallace, Inc., 97 F.3d 1227, 1230-1234 (9th Cir. 1996)), making it much harder to level the playing field. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 1:13 pm
Pfizer, Inc., 358 F.3d 659 (9th Cir. 2004), on there being no duty – or no causation – where plaintiffs demand that physicians be warned about things they already know: [The prescriber] knew of the risk of malignancies associated with 6–MP and Humira, but still prescribed the medication. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:41 pm
Manufactured by Pfizer, Inc. [read post]
13 May 2012, 4:46 pm
Hospira, Inc. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:27 pm
Pfizer, Inc., 773 N.E.2d 720 (Ill. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 7:08 pm
The first multiple PTE case up-to-bat concerns Gilead Sciences Inc. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
Medtronic Inc., No. 06-179, Justice Antonin Scalia said that permitting state juries to impose liability on the maker of an approved device “disrupts the federal scheme,” under which the F.D.A. has the responsibility for evaluating the risks and benefits of a new device and assuring that it is safe and effective for its intended use. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:38 am
Pfizer, Inc., 2004 WL 2191804, *4 & n.4 (S.D. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:34 pm
"The Draft continues to use the "carve at the joint" metaphor from In re Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Inc., 51 F.3d 1293 (7th Cir. 1995) (e.g., §2.03, comment c & Reporters' Notes) to justify widespread issue certification, even though Rhone-Poulenc used that phrase not in support of issue certification, but to caution against bifurcating a trial in a way that would have different juries examining the same issue in violation of the Seventh Amendment. 51 F.3d… [read post]
