Search for: "Pace v. State" Results 1441 - 1460 of 1,787
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2015, 2:46 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Dozens of state statutes restrict assignment clauses. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:28 am by Rob Robinson
http://bit.ly/VHJMLy (Mikki Tomlinson) Reports and ResourcesCanadian eDiscovery Case Law Digests – Common Law -  http://bit.ly/UEJMX6 (Peg Duncan) Disclosure and Discovery in Utah – http://bit.ly/Uy1vzC (Utah Courts) Ethics of Twitter Research: Topology of Disciplines, Methods and Ethics Review Boards – http://bit.ly/UzhU6Y (Nick Proferes, Michael Zimmer) November Edition of Notable Cases and Events in #eDiscovery (PDF) http://bit.ly/RTr5Sl (Sidley Austin) Randoms vs… [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 7:16 am by Cameron Kerry
In June, the Supreme Court provided appellate judges with a neutron bomb against agency regulations with its decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Among the privacy cases of early 2011 was MNB v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWHC 528 (QB)). [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 4:10 pm by Jag
 The Commissioner argued that they were being retained in accordance with the law under s.64A PACE and the Management of Police Information (‘MoPI’) code of practice  and guidance – which states that records should be kept for a blanket minimum of six years before deletion is considered. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 2:34 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In response, policyholders have argued (with varying degrees of success from state to state) that public policy concerns are the properly left to the legislative branch. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Time has proven that diversity trickles up at a glacial pace. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 1:57 pm by Xandra Kramer
Victoria Sahani (Professor, Arizona State University) approached the issue of TPLF from the perspective of arbitration, both commercial and investor-State arbitration. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:15 am by GuestPost
   Because there is no need for ‘reasonable suspicion’ the section 44 power does not engage the Code A Guidance under PACE which states that a person’s race cannot be used alone, or n conjunction with any other factor as the reasons for searching that person (para 2.2). [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:31 am by SHG
The case helped bring an end to the death penalty in New York and was cited by the United States Supreme Court in the 1966 Miranda v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
In its original form, Part V introduces new criminal offences for disclosure of public authority and government data with no specified protection for public interest journalism. [read post]