Search for: "People v. Angel" Results 1441 - 1460 of 2,313
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2011, 11:33 am by David Lat
It was the subject of a recent Supreme Court case, Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 6:50 pm by Adam Schlossman
In non-nomination news: The cross in the Mojave dessert that was at the center of the recent Supreme Court decision in Salazar v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
People should think about their own conduct. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 10:36 am by John Elwood
Inter partes review is an administrative mechanism the America Invents Act created in 2011 to allow people to challenge issued patents. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm by Kashmir Hill & Elie Mystal
Let’s get to it… Elie waxes poetic about the West Coast: LOS ANGELES v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 10:45 am by Jeralyn
As you know, the Supreme Court crafted the “public safety exception” to Miranda more than 25 years ago in New York v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:50 am by Matthew Guariglia
FRT has a long history of misidentifying people of color and trans* and nonbinary people, even leading to wrongful arrests and police harassment. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:50 am by Matthew Guariglia
FRT has a long history of misidentifying people of color and trans* and nonbinary people, even leading to wrongful arrests and police harassment. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
Los Angeles, 11-798, involves whether regulations implementing the Port of Los Angeles’s “Clean Trucks Program” are preempted by the Federal Aviation Administrative Authorization Act or, if you like living dangerously close to the edge of a Microsoft sticky-keys warning, the FAAAA. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 12:32 pm by Ashoka Mukpo
The ACLU is currently suing to end the MPP, with the 9th Circuit having heard arguments in the case, Innovation Law Lab v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 10:07 am by Venkat Balasubramani
It would be great if the Supreme Court in Elonis issues an opinion that lets people to make ill-advised social media mistakes without fear of prosecution, but I’m not optimistic we’ll get anything so clean. __ Case Citation: State v. [read post]