Search for: "People v. Part"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 25,253
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2015, 6:52 pm
I often hear from people who have entered a plea and want to talk about hiring me to withdraw it. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 8:27 am
S. 622, 684 (1994) (O’Connor, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); PruneYard Shopping Center v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 11:09 am
These changes include: Amending 42 C.F.R. 422.112(a)(8) to require MAOs to ensure that services are provided in a culturally competent manner and to promote equitable access to all enrollees, including: (i) people with limited English proficiency or reading skills; (ii) people of ethnic, cultural, racial, or religious minorities; (iii) people with disabilities; (iv) people who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or other diverse sexual orientations;… [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
In the 2010 Supreme Court case, J.D.B. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:07 pm
In Abood v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:00 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:35 am
In Valdez v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 12:16 pm
” Hart v. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 6:40 pm
Many people consider Ralph Nader the true pioneer of Product Liability. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 9:04 am
The specific issue in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 10:20 pm
v=udEcTpLFIkk This week's episode also marks the beginning of a new segment that tackles Will Challenge Litigation step-by-step. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 2:14 pm
Those records were not received by the court, and are not part of the record on appeal.People v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 7:39 am
On the contrary, with the Tea Party seizing on Article V to demand repeal of numerous Amendments ratified by the American people over the full sweep of our history, it is critical for the American people to understand the full arc of our constitutional story and to take our Constitution back. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 8:43 am
In its judgment in the case of Handzhiyski v Bulgaria ([2021] ECHR 283) the Fourth Section of the Court held, by a six-one majority, that convicting and fining a local politician who had placed a Santa Claus hat on a statute of a former Communist and put a red sack at its feet as part of a political and satirical protest was an unjustified interference with his right to freedom of expression under Article 10. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 11:48 am
MPAA did a study showing that search engines are the main means by which people get pirated content. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:32 pm
R. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:20 am
Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 7:19 am
Defamation * Lokhova v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 6:53 am
[Continued from yesterday's Part 1.] [read post]
