Search for: "Pfizer, Inc. (Pfizer)"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 1,505
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2024, 7:08 pm
The first multiple PTE case up-to-bat concerns Gilead Sciences Inc. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:22 pm
Eric Affeldt, chief executive, ClubCorp Inc. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Pfizer Inc., 358 F.3d 659, 661 (9th Cir. 2004) (same; physician considered warning inappropriate) (applying California law).Under these facts, if Conte were an ordinary prescription drug product liability case, plaintiff would have been out of court and out of luck, just like Motus. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
By now Restatement (Second) of Torts §402A (1965) is so old as to be thought of as somewhat antediluvian. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 10:36 am
Wyeth, Inc., 2007 WL 2458021 (E.D. [read post]
14 May 2007, 7:03 am
Pfizer, Inc., 2006 WL 2819046, at *7-8 (D.N.J. [read post]
31 May 2007, 4:31 am
Pfizer, Inc., 2007 WL 1228784, at *3 (S.D. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
Pfizer, Inc., 358 F.3d 659, 661 (9th Cir. 2004) (“the doctor who prescribed [the drug] . . . failed to read [the defendant’s] published warnings before prescribing the drug. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
Of course, whether reliance and causation are elements of a UCL claim is an unresolved question that the Supreme Court is expected to address in In re Tobacco and Pfizer. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
Pfizer, 196 F. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Conference of September 29, 2008 __________________ Docket: 07-811 Case name: Morris, et al. v Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. et al. [read post]
1 May 2008, 11:21 am
Beretta USA, Inc., No. 05-6942-cv (2d Cir. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
Brief in opposition of respondents Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc. et al. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
Medtronic Inc., No. 06-179, Justice Antonin Scalia said that permitting state juries to impose liability on the maker of an approved device “disrupts the federal scheme,” under which the F.D.A. has the responsibility for evaluating the risks and benefits of a new device and assuring that it is safe and effective for its intended use. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
Monoclonal Antibodies Inc., 1985) protected large genus claims. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
This new article of mine will be coming out next year in the Journal of Law and Religion, and I thought I'd serialize it here; there's still plenty of time for editing, so I'd love to hear people's feedback. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 12:04 pm
By Hal WegnerBefore an overflow hearing room on an internationally available web broadcast, Chairman Howard Berman of the House Judiciary Subcommittee relevant to patents hosted a most informative and candid hearing yesterday afternoon joined by roughly ten of his committee colleagues, including Rep. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 9:32 am
Goodman Distr., Inc., 694 F. [read post]
