Search for: "Phillips v. Phillips"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 3,828
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2009, 7:56 am
Sutton Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:40 am
Payton v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 8:41 am
The deadline for either a cert petition or request for additional time to file a cert petition in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 11:41 pm
Such is the case with Lima v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 12:45 pm
In Nunes v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 12:03 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:05 pm
Phillips, 801 S.W.2d 523, 525 (Tex. 1991). [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 9:42 am
For publication opinions today (3): Heather Parks and Jimmy Phillips v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 8:38 am
The Supreme Court released its opinion in Teva v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:08 am
It is for Lords Phillips, Brown and Kerr to determine whether there is an automatic right to appeal. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 2:32 pm
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:46 am
In support of this, he cited the view of Mr Justice Colman in Navigas v Enron. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:50 pm
The difference in presenting data to a jury v. to a judge is a big one. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 11:19 am
With respect to the first counterclaim, defendants submitted evidence establishing the reasonable value of their services (see generally Phillips Nizer Benjamin Krim & Ballon v Chu, 240 AD2d 231, 659 N.Y.S.2d 4), and plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to defendants' entitlement to the fees sought (see generally DiPlacidi v Walsh, 243 AD2d 335, 664 N.Y.S.2d 537; [**3] Pirro & Monsell v Freddolino, 204 AD2d 613, 614… [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:14 am
Shawe’s allegations that the attorney defendants deceptively backdated a retainer agreement primarily relates to privilege assertions in the Delaware action, and not in New York, and, as such, is not actionable under § 487 (see Doscher v Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, 148 AD3d 523, 524 [1st Dept 2017]). [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:55 am
Lords Phillips, Walker, Brown and Mance dismissed it on the basis that even if information was held only partly for the purposes of journalism, art or literature, it remained outside the scope of FOIA. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 4:06 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 10:49 am
’”Phillips, 415 F.3d at 1322–23 (quoting VitronicsCorp. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:45 am
Marsh v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 7:23 am
PatLit compare Mr Justice Birss' judgments in Accord v Medac and Trial C in the Unwired Planet v Huawei tussle in "Common General Knowledge and Inconvenient Details" and the commentary on obviousness as an attack on a patent's validity. [read post]
